HN user

s_m

122 karma

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/seb_m; my proof: https://keybase.io/seb_m/sigs/LurSRSmxsYz6-HlCS-Baw0ap0F1K5-kPjjyNCCz5Jy8 ]

Posts0
Comments86
View on HN
No posts found.
Foobar2000 4 years ago

I loved Foobar2000 back in my Windows days. iTunes just wasn't as fun an experience.

"week year" was the cause of a big Twitter outage during the time I worked there. In the immediate aftermath there was a "see? this is why we need a monorepo" exhortation from leadership.

My definition of "having fun" while coding is to feel like I'm not struggling to manifest whatever idea it is I have. To that end, right now I find writing for Google Cloud to be fun; it requires almost no backend expertise to stitch products together to make a decently powerful API, which I can easily build a frontend against.

Scala's community has a reputation for toxicity. I don't write Scala, so I don't know how deserved this is, but nevertheless the reputation exists.

In the late 00's, SVN was the dominant version control system, but it had lots of pain points (eg reliant on remote server, lots of crappy little .svn directories, branching was difficult, very difficult to make a git repo for small projects etc) that Git resolved. At this time, hg and bzr were also on the scene, but Github quickly became incredible popular, for a few reasons - Sourceforce, the incumbent community home for open source, was a comparatively inferior user experience - Rails, which was a dominant OSS project in that era, was hosted there, and the Rails / Ruby community converged on GH as a result - Heroku was a trendy platform during this time, which at the time you deployed by `git push`-ing, so git knowledge was required to take advantage of it.

I downloaded a .syx and loaded it into Dexed. About half the patches don't make any sound, but the ones that remain are pretty good. Various classic FM sounds in the Sonic the Hedgehog vein.

He doesn't explain why he can't afford to pay his staff to work more than the unemployment benefits. He doesn't explain why he doesn't pay these chefs more than $26/hour. He doesn't even say "I can't afford to do it". He just says, "I’d have to offer my cooks $25.40 an hour to match what the government is paying them not to work" and expects the reader to comprehend his perspective - in other words, to be complicit in his exploitation.