rwoerz

Cool, so now I can leave my lawnmower where it belongs.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39521535

Now I have that image in mind, where some Morlock finds that thing 100000 years after we have blown up our civilization and can actually make use of it.

Those were the days of the dotcom era when finding the next restaurant with your Nokia + WAP was THE killer use case.

The issue here is communication, as the number of people grows, the number of communication paths between those people grows exponentially.

Exponentially? Quadratically I would say.

They stopped at the Promises level with CompletableFuture that lead to "colored frameworks" like WebMVC vs. WebFlux in Spring.

A reference [1] in an attempt to go one level of self-reference further.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727104

Or a 256 bytes prompt

Blocked in Germany by CUII https://cuii.info/ueber-uns/

Death has Chucknorrised?

Let's call that "semantic diffusion", too, just to make "semantic diffusion" a little self-referring.

so, that's how i can show my full devotion to the agi?

That description really excels

They had some kind of "microlithic" architecture.

Congrats.

Some German natives may argue that the time short forms are wrong as they prefer "dreiviertel" instead of "viertel vor".

Another one writes in Rust

Another one writes in Rust

And another one Go, and another one Go

Another one writes in Rust (yeah)

Another one bites the Rust

right click copy right click paste

Remembers me of a fellow student who refused to maximize his editor window. It turned out that he moved the text cursor to the next line with the right indentation by using just a lot of spaces.

He is dead??

The Drawin Awards need a category for the best newcomer or so.

{ "permissions": { "allow": [ "Human(*)" ] } }

?

The provided text explores the significant transformation of reading in the digital age, contrasting traditional reading habits with contemporary practices influenced by technology and artificial intelligence.

---

### The Evolution of Reading

A few decades ago, *reading was a straightforward, private activity*, where individuals engaged with physical texts at their own pace. The internet, however, has fundamentally shifted this experience. While some still prefer traditional books, many now encounter texts through various digital platforms, often switching between formats like e-readers and audio narration. The constant presence of distractions like YouTube and Netflix means that reading today often requires a conscious effort to *choose not to stop*.

---

### Declining Traditional Reading Rates

This shift has been particularly pronounced among younger generations. The *National Endowment for the Arts* reported a decline in adults reading at least one book a year, from *55% to 48%* over the decade leading up to 2023. More dramatically, the *National Center for Education Statistics* found that the number of *thirteen-year-olds who read for fun "almost every day" plummeted from 27% to 14%* in roughly the same period. This decline has led to increased concerns from college professors about students' ability to engage with complex, lengthy texts.

---

### The "Gutenberg Parenthesis" and the Rise of AI

The text discusses the concept of the "Gutenberg Parenthesis," suggesting that the internet closed a historical period dominated by print, returning us to a more conversational and decentralized communication style. The rise of podcasts and newsletters supports this idea of a "secondary orality."

However, the emergence of *artificial intelligence (AI)*, particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude, introduces a new dimension to this evolution. These AI systems "read" and process unimaginable quantities of text at superhuman speeds, recalling information, drawing connections, and extracting insights. This has led some, like economist Tyler Cowen, to consider "writing for the AIs," envisioning a future where AI can analyze and preserve a writer's thought process.

---

### AI-Assisted Reading and the Future of Text

AI's capabilities allow for *new forms of reading, such as on-demand abridgments and summaries*. Tools like Blinkist already offer condensed versions of books. AI can also simplify complex texts, as demonstrated by Claude rewriting the challenging opening of "Bleak House" into more modern English. This blurs the line between original texts and their summarized or altered versions, suggesting a future where readers might routinely start with alternative texts and only later seek out originals.

While some texts, like complex literary works, may lose their essence when summarized, and the value of authentic human voices will likely persist, the text posits that the *intrinsic integrity of writing might become less powerful*. The analogy of music sampling suggests that "remix culture" could extend to reading, where multiple versions of a text exist and are accepted.

The author reflects on their own intensive reading experiences as a Ph.D. student, highlighting the *finitude of human reading and memory*. AI, by contrast, can help find value in otherwise unread texts and potentially deepen reading memories by enabling ongoing interaction with information. However, AI lacks intrinsic motivation and relies on human "reading culture" for its usefulness.

The article concludes by contemplating a future where *text is fluid, fungible, and abstractable*. Getting the "gist" of a text will be easy, and encountering the original will become a conscious choice. This could lead to new writing styles, with some writers aiming to repel automated reading, and a shift in what it means to be "well-read." Text may transition from a finished product to a "stepping stone to something else."

(8) be good in counting things, (h) be consistent in your thinking, (10) have a good memory, (11) be good in counting things, (12) refrain from making silly comments

My favourite sleep aid video.

My guess: No, they won't

Neitherway

AFAIR keyword substitution of $Id$ included the revision number. That would be the commit hash in Git. For obvious reasons you cannot insert a hash value in content from which that hash value is being computed.

Some of the voting results on https://abstimmung.eu/git/2024 are misleading. Votings are about a decision recommendation (Beschlussempfehlung) which sometimes negates the original request (Antrag), e.g., https://abstimmung.eu/votes/55

You can get her with

  git blame

And then God spoke to me: "Sir, you have the greatest and most beautiful tariffs." And I said: "Yes, beautiful and great. Like the son I never had."

How many R's are in "strawberry"? ;)