Oh, the The Linus Circus is in town again. Good times.
HN user
raz0r
What's up with russians? I wouldn't give a username and password to americans either.
Really? Replace C? Really? http://golang.org/src/
ZOMG! Them horrors. Someone is calling something wrong names. Never seen that coming.
First of all, why would you assume that by "usability" I mean "being able to understand and completely master at the first sight"?; Let me tell you why, because __some__ users of Emacs think that by learning to use some bloated piece of junk software will make them special, that by learning to use Emacs they somehow demonstrate their intellectual superiority among their mates. So you're inferring that people who don't like Emacs or prefer other editors are somehow intellectually inferior to those who learn it and use it. Well, that is not the case. In fact, if you can achieve exactly the same thing with a simpler, easier to use tool and you're still using the bloated one, it's you who is mentally retarded, not those who use the other tool. So just to conclude, just spare me and others of this bullshit. And also please note that I know what usability is, and when I wrote my previous comment I was thinking about very precise Emacs issues which I don't have time and I also don't want to discuss. But that's just the way I feel about Emacs. You might very well use and love it but please don't try to sell me your bullshit.
Dark arts indeed. Emacs is an usability atrocity.
Wow, that's all you have to say? I hate to disappoint you but this is not StackOverblow. And while we're at it tell your fat friend to do some research before writing posts on that funny blog of his. He writes about a lot of stuff he heard about just the day before in a style which suggests that he's an expert on those topics, which may turn very unproductive for kids who read the funny blog and take his word for granted without further investigations.
No, I don't want to forget about no damn grep, sed, and the like.
Both Erlang VM and HiPE are written in C, which powers.. The point is not who powers which software program, the point is that you cannot write operating systems and drivers in Java. I hope you realize that Java gets run inside a vritual machine. And so is Erlang. Also C and C++ power a number substantially bigger than "a 3d software program", if you want to put it like that, which isn't the point..
You say funny things. Not everything can be built with high-level languages. Some people work on operating systems, others on database systems, etc. So stop this nonsense, I have some breaking news for you: not everyone writes web applications these days.
"You can also now remove items from your dashboard, so that you can see a quick summary of only your most important links and hide the ones you no longer need."
I've been waiting for this.
How is nginx' concurrency achieved? Does it use something like libev/libevent ?
Yes, I'll have to agree with that.
Ohhh poor baby, isn't he posting his name on every possible forum on the Internet talking about how he, the biggest "hacker" of all time hacked the PS3 anymore? Not funny anymore eh? I think he deserves what he got, that's what happens when you're young, stupid and looking for fame.
Actually it looks very bad, feels clunky and the revenue model is idiotic with a passion.
I haven't thought about that yet, but you are correct.
The icon is horrible too.
Remove Apache and install a real web server.
Thanks so much. This looks very, very promising.
http://pythonpaste.org/webob/do-it-yourself.html
Sometimes Python is accused of having too many web frameworks. And it’s true, there are a lot. That said, I think writing a framework is a useful exercise. It doesn’t let you skip over too much without understanding it. It removes the magic. So even if you go on to use another existing framework (which I’d probably advise you do), you’ll be able to understand it better if you’ve written something like it on your own.
This tutorial shows you how to create a web framework of your own, using WSGI and WebOb. No other libraries will be used.
Yeah, this is stupid.
This is really tragic.
No Go? :(
You got me a lot more curious about Go than I already was.
How would it be possible for a fucking computer to predict the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, knowing that the cause of the disaster was "a result of damage sustained ___during_launch___ when a piece of foam insulation the size of a small briefcase broke off the Space Shuttle external tank (the main propellant tank) under the aerodynamic forces of launch." o,.O
Yes, it's the new behaviour that he's talking about.