rangerelf

That's exactly what jonhohle was talking about -_-

llama-server from the llama.cpp package has a local web interface.

Because the companies that are pushing for DC constructions are corruptors, and some politicians are easy to corrupt.

The problem isn't the availability of lower quality versions of a high-quality product, it's the transformation of a formerly high-quality product into a shitty-quality version, meanwhile, maintaining the same price, or worse, a higher price, than the former high-quality version of itself.

The price tags on tools don't go down with time, but the quality of the tools certainly does.

I'm all for tiering product lines, harbor freight is doing it right by offering their top-of-the-line in the Hercules brand, a "pretty good for non contractor" line with Bauer, and then there's lower tiers for one-offs. But if I look for, and buy, a Porter Cable tool, I'm buying it because I expect a certain performance and quality, but it's in fact a rug pull right now. That should be fraud.

You're not the only one. In college I took a compilers course and we used the dragon book, to me it sucked the joy out of the magical concept of making a compiler.

Some years later I (re-) discovered Forth, and I thought "why not?" and built my own forth in 32-bit Intel assembly, _that_ brought back the wonder and "magical" feeling of compilers again. All in less than 4KB.

I guess I wasn't the right audience for the dragon book.

Do you have any links to support this? Because the commonality of all arguments _against_ has been that they make water and power crazy expensive for everyone that has to live close to the newly opened datacenters, while the DC operator enjoys subsidized land use tax, water and power.

This right here is the right take.

This is to laughably misguided that it leans toward malicious.

I mean, you're talking about Elon, the Doge guy, the one who organized mass hoovering of citizens data from whatever sources he could get his grubby mitts on? That Elon?

Opposed to mass surveillance??

And then you sprinkle some commonly known truths on top to make your comment palatable ("we're being divided and conquered!"), and finally you add a dash of malicious speculation to seed some doubt against the organization ("Perhaps the EFF has been compromised!! It's a trick!!").

No thanks.

If it's impossible for a service provider to even talk to its customers, why is it in operation at all?

This was a very sweet video card.

On the other hand, EVERY young person in my circle (my kids and their friends) is insanely privacy aware. All of that means ... we're not part of the young people anymore?

I think there's more than enough evidence that Zuck has not grown to see others as human beings.

Have you tried Nim? Strong and static typed, versatile, compiles down to native code vía C, interops with C trivially, has macros and stuff to twist your brain if you're into that, and is trivially easy to get into.

https://nim-lang.org

Not disagreeing, just a question: if you were to catch it, would you stay inside until you're healthy again and not a danger to others?

It's not just its age, it's how easy it is (was?) to jump in and start writing useful code that could be revisited later on and be able to read it and understand it again.

All of these efforts to turn it into another Typescript are going to, in the end, kill the ease of use it has always had.

I kind of object to this take.

Nobody's talking about porting billions of lines of code, for all we know it's just for personal projects, or a learning experience.

This kind of replies is like killing an idea before it's even started, smells like the sunk cost fallacy.

OTOH I do understand the weight of a currently existing corpus in production, evidence is the ton of COBOL code still running. But still, your reply kind of sucks.

I was looking for someone else that had done this, I had the same exact experience.

That said, anyone looking into a completely static typed language that has nice ergonomics, is easy to pick up but has enough depth to keep you busy for weeks on end, and is versatile enough to be used for anything, do yourself a favor and give Nim a try.

https://nim-lang.org/

You're not wrong.

I've seen so many things announced that make me ask myself "But, why?".

If only you'd bothered to quote the rest of the sentence:

"Android-like touch screen UI with gestures"

Could have used also "IPad-like..." or "IPhone-like..." and it would have meant basically the same. Maybe author is more familiar with Android?

PS: What's with all the outrage manufacturing?

What if the text is already in a [string] buffer?

You're being willfully dense, I do not believe it's up for debate.

Governments that public force to kidnap, torture, murder, "disappear" their own citizens, are bad. Plenty of examples to go around, both historically and currently: China, Russia, México, North Korea, Belarus, the balcans, plenty of African governments, etc.

It shouldn't matter that "34% of my neighbors" want me sent to a concentration camp, personally I wouldn't want to end up there.

The example you're giving, the whole "it really depends on people's views, ..." is a bad government.

And the truth is that it's easy to be a good government: don't be bad.

Edit: fixed a word.

Because, nature in its infinite wisdom, gets rid of what's not used.

You don't use your muscles? They atrophy. You don't make an effort to travel without a gps regularily, to force your brain to remember your way around naturally? Your spatial memory atrophies and becomes useless [here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62877-0 ]

People don't need to learn math anymore, hence, no more calculus lessons? People are literally becoming idiots who can't calculate simple change at the cash register without pulling out their calculators.

It's exercise. It keeps the brain itself from atrophying. It stops you from becoming a "wetware LLM" that's just parroting whatever echo of a thought (natural or otherwise) goes through it.

It doesn't matter if you can't solve a randomly-appearing-in-your-newsreel integral; it matters that you have the background knowledge of what an integral is, that there are rules to solving it, and you can read up on the rules and understand them.

For the [current] layperson, each of those things I mentioned I might as well be speaking in Martian.

Why would anyone give them any money AT ALL?

It's not like they're poor or struggling.

Am I missing something?

It's like you didn't read the article.

They address exactly that gripe at the end.

Imagine being so deluded and disconnected that you actually believe that AI has any similarity with the printing press regarding the benefits to The People.

Don't be dense.

At least try to keep up with the main concern: "sending potentially private or security impacting information in plaintext across the internet".

"Does not exist blah blah"

That has to be one of the most inane replies I've read in a while.

The one I am assuming you are referring to is Meta, and they are getting sued. They arguably should also be facing criminal charges too under current law.

I think your assumption is falling too short, it's not just Meta, it's OpenAI, it's Anthropic, it's Google, and Microsoft, and others.

Like you said, the court case hasn't finished, but there's meddling from the Whitehouse already; I really doubt there's going to be any fair play in this case.

A better analogy is that LLM crawlers are candy store workers going through the houses grabbing free candy and then selling it in their own shop.

Scalpers. Knowledge scalpers.

Does it matter?

Will the existence or lack thereof excuse the absolute lack of security and privacy this package exhibits? And the lack of interest from the developer?