ralabaster

Oh, so now they’re ‘forbidden’? A few months ago they were only ‘impossible’.[1] I saved the article (which also was here on HN) at the time because it contains the conceit “science does what puny humans say is impossible,” but the people who say things are impossible are scientists themselves. Are we supposed to be impressed by that? Plagiarists, AKA journalists, get paid to copy other people’s work. Come to think of it, that’s what Stack Exchange is for, too…

[1]https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01332-0

Not sure of the point of naming after “bad money drives out the good.” A smirk, perhaps?

Let’s hope merchants don’t buy in, because the cattle don’t know the difference between “basic income” and “basically a Ponzi scheme.”

Your eyesight glides over it as if it’s not there? Oddly enough, that seems perfect from an uncluttered-design standpoint. Can you still find menus when they’re hidden behind invisible hamburgers, perhaps by association with the top of the page?