my quota reset every time they release (or pull) a new model, pretty sweet
HN user
rainwolf
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rainwolf; my proof: https://keybase.io/rainwolf/sigs/-xygXgDwvDnQR4ymQKjO1tXTKQLl6tMN9cWo_rJNCCc ]
The plot of season 4 reminded me a little too much of "Orphans of the helix"
because in Europe, livestock welfare matters more and more
Probably because they offer to make you employable in just a few months.
I highly recommend "Turing's Cathedral" by George Dyson. I easily rate it n+1 stars out of n.
The last line in the article refers to that very twitter account.
The project was on the brink of collapsing a few years back, there was a ProPublica article back then that shed some light on what you're asking.
https://www.propublica.org/article/the-worlds-email-encrypti...
Note that with FileVault on, backups are not automatically encrypted. Time Machine is a smooth backup experience, but should be encrypted as well.
That's easy: they were making money with it. Now for my question: what made them give up on all that revenue?
The internet is indeed not the answer, 42 is.
I'm not saying it's retribution, I'm saying it's shortsighted to consider it damaging to themselves and be okay with the damage that was detailed in the leaks.
I'm not okay with either, but being blind to others' "suffering" doesn't get my sympathy. In this order of events, your sympathy gets mine. In this case, you pointing the finger at others hacking innocents as a justification for hacking innocents makes me entirely unsympathetic to your "damage". See how that works?
It is really damaging, but that's from a perspective that, as a superpower, they were benefiting from control and domination. The same perspective implies that the target was being damaged by these actions. Targets that are not always adversaries. Targets that could contribute if not being controlled, dominated, and damaged.
It's not easy to see, but damaging others denies them the contributions they could bring, ultimately damaging themselves.