ppbutt

30% is outrageous

Thanks for the tip. Shame on them.

No

I'd imagine some recognition technology could take into account body proportions, posture, (commonly worn) apparel, etc. to make facial recognition less needed.

"They" would be the proper term.

Instagram has the same clause too

User intrusion seems to be a pattern with Mozilla now.

It's the obvious malicious intent that we see time and time again with Facebook, the companies they own, and like-minded companies like Google and Amazon. People are fed up with the BS. It's atrocious that no tech people speak out or get the airtime to inform people what's going on without their knowledge (and most of the time, consent). Facebook is a scourge to humanity.

Do you realize Facebook has the power to change this all, but instead keeps people misinformed with their obvious malicious intent?

Because it's apparent that's not Facebook's goal.

So when is everybody going to band together to bury Facebook and all these other insidious tech companies?

How do you all bypass these horrendous paywalls?

Monopoly and complacent governements

Good info

CIA creates more terrorists than it purportedly defuses by seeding deep resentment in people through the CIA's actions (torture being one of them).

Does this include the forced collection of the user's usage data?

Funny how they're adament that Facebook doesn't utilize microphone (while they still don't really know themselves). Why is it laughable that Facebook is using both the FB Pixel, microphone, and other technologies to spy?

Any other source or way to get around the WSJ paywall?

Research with caution. (Guidelines/laws maybe?)

They already exist in parts of the world like Saudi Arabia, no? (Can't read the article because I don't pay to view their site..)

In what way?

Don't you think some of that could be perpetrated by Google, to sabotage competition? Same thing plagued Vidme, but the thing is - you can find the same stuff on YouTube - it's just more diluted by other content.

Anybody else worried/cautious about giving a company even more data about one's location, driving habits, etc. (also, without that company sharing that data with the user whose data it is) - also, knowing that the company is truly in control of the vehicle? I'm all for renewable energy and electric vehicles, but it could be done without selling the user.

Right, nobody would ever lie or stretch the truth right?

"Facebook to put out PR story to try to stay relevant"

And all while profiting from their users (and non-users) behind their back.

Funny how HackerNews deletes comments that warn against this... what side are the admins on?

Guy named Sentdex has YouTube tutorials for machine learning using GTA.

Grammatical

"Television has sought to make football more palatable to viewing audiences by magnifying the game’s balletic beauty and deëmphasizing the its brute concussive aggression."

Grammar error in the first photo caption...