poelzi

The trick was: Lime CHUNKS, proper volcanic fly ash, salt water + no steel. Self repairing and more flexible

i'm doing this using nix2container and a rust program that generates a landlock filter so i can mount nix store and only the supplied derivates are visible :) coming to you in a few month, tix.im

tbh, this is the most powerful computer program I have ever seen. Working on this now for over 6 month, ~600k LOC. I think it will grow to 800k in the base package. Unfortunately, uncompromised security requires quite some LOC.

This works: tix workflow submit ../vx-maintainer/workflows/change-management/default.nix --follow -- --feature-branch="feat/2lines" --instructions="tui overview should show running flows in 2 lines. 2 line: running steps, done, failed, etc. reports counter: info/success/failed/warning/error sparkle line with load ... . then if extended by double click, each running step has a line. what step, memory, cpu usage, token counters, ... subgraphs should be rendered under the parent flow. Title should always show that subgraph. details has link to parent " --source-repo=/home/poelzi/Projects/tix/tixim --implementor=opencode\#gpt-5.5

I get a human gate after the plan is finished where I can give feedback (in this workflow). And then another gate when everything is done. 4 different models, multiple harnesses, multiple reviews, rest cases etc. :) It makes me so smile watching the workflow progress. And the shit becomes global in a few days...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite same same, just different time and job.

I don't see anybody using a hand drill anymore - your hands will become all weak and you will lose your ability to drill good holes by hand...

If you want anti AI sentiment, you should take a visit to /r/rust

I have build a proper workflow system for complex work that composes environments from nix flakes (very extended flakes) - it allows you to combines deterministic with agentic steps. The release process is a workflow in your project that requires to generate reproducible outputs - nix does this for you. The network basically is a distributed CI system - Multiple parties need to check and build your release. When all parties agree, that the package is correct, the SUI smart contract gives it's go. IKA is a multi party encryption network which implements a novel MCP-2pc algorithm. Your release key is split in half - IKA has one part, you have the other. Only is both parties sign the transaction, your software package gets release. Every party, even your PC can be compromised, and it is very hard to just release malware in your package. The whole release pipeline needs to succeed ant then you need to sign it with your hardware token. There are mandatory workflows in the release pipeline that check your software for side loading, comparing your dependency tree to the last version published, etc.

It is the largest project I have ever build and I code since 25 years.

I was just not satisfied with the agentic tools out there, nor with the CI / build infrastructure. Nix is nice, but the way packages are build / signed is just half way to perfect.

We can be lucky that the github hack did not infect the CI infrastructure. Imagine you infect the compilers in github CI to add a sleeper worm that does nothing for a month...

Only if you have multiple parties, building the same software with bootstrapped compilers and every artifact is hash compared, you can be sure it is legit

Working hard on the github killer. Fully decentralized with nearly unbreakable release system. Multiple parties need to produce the same artifacts in the release workflow. IKA then signs the release on the network side, you sign your release using hardware token. Release pipeline analysis source code for malware on the complete dependency chain. Rust + Nix + SUI + WALRUS + SEAL + IKA - a complete decentralized economy. A few more weeks until testnet :)

Nobody uses grok except checking shit on X At least the hardware is not idle

I'm building a fix since over half a year. Very sophisticated workflow engine for the paranoid with strong AI integration and fully decentralized and deterministic behavior. Nix, Rust, SUI, Walrus, SEAL, IKA and my engine/framework + many tools. One goal is to have multiple workflows by independent parties that not only check the compiler output, but do advanced source chain analysis. When enough parties report successful run, the IKA network signs the build digests. You can hold the second part of the key, so only you + successful pipeline will result in a release. No single point of failure, no single party that can be hacked.

Overwhelming and overloaded. Terminals need to be 1 thing first: fast, and there it fails miserably.

I love niri. I'm half way through getting hdr rendering running

And also bridges the HDMI monitor into his network or does any OS automatically link that ? EoH is mostly for smart TVs

The nix store can do hard linking for the hashsum files. The nix store is read-only so you don't get modifications in general - does not really matter for boot disks, but in general.

The difference is, you can create proper abstraction modules that put everything together, from dependencies, to config files, firewall rules etc and have nice options for your abstraction.

No other system provides this in that sane way. I used countless configuration systems, from custom bash hacks, ansible, chef, puppet, salt - I have seen a lot.

Nix is just on another level. Never going back

There is always someone 100 years ahead of time: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1424329112

These are the ones I'm searching for and if their model is more logical, requires less assumptions, explains more and is more consistent, I change my paradigm. Unfortunately, you then have to either stop writing in forums like this, or get downvoted into oblivion.

I would have loved to know what I know now when my father had leucemia. He did everything the doctors told him to, but died a very ugly, painful death. I fucking hold his hand when he died so FU.

He was eating and acting wrongly and was in the wrong state of mind - last one I knew and tried multiple times to get out of it, but he did not listen.

You understand nothing about biology and are not even able to quickly search scholar.

https://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=fi&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=cance...

Every fucking expert on sugar will tell you that this stuff is unhealty. I wrote multiple times, it depends on the cancer.

And I never said he should avoid regular treatment.

Stand with him and help him through his hard time - when he has fought it off, you will be buddies for life.

There is no universal cure for cancer, but most of them can be starved out. Carbohydrates are fuel for cancer avoid them on all cost. Depending on the cancer, fasting and strong reduction of caloric intake. Some expert say, you should avoid autophagy, some say, 30-40 day fast can starve it out - depending on the type. GDF-11 seems to to have fixed some - needs to be precisely adjusted based on bio markers. There are some peptides to boost immune system. If he wants to eat, vegan and mostly greens, fibers and no processed foods.

As a biohacker, my suggestion: Vitamin D, K MH-7, Zinc, Se-Methyl L-Selenocysteine, Zone 2 Training, Stretching 2x day 15 minutes at least (immune-cells use fascia as roads - glued fascia layers are a breeding ground for cancer)

Last update 3 years ago, closed source. Why ?

The only reason it gives you the illusion of beeing richer then our previous generations is, that you can now buy tons of cheap Chinese shit for which your grandparents had to buy very expensive western utilities (the stuff that still works).

Otherwise, we are, on average, poorer then our parents. Our kids, if you are still consider having them, will be poorer then you.

A necessary result from capitalism with fiat money. However, if your wealth exceeds a certain threshold, currently something around 1.5-2 million €, you will benefit from this system and earn more all the time.

The big bang bullshit is falsified, read the papers collected there http://cosmology.info/

I studied philosophy and physics in my youth and I can distinguish between a genius and a "crackpot" very well. Details are what counts, you can get every model to fit roughly if you don't care about the number of constants involved. If the model is correct, it also works for extreme situation. FQHE is the extrem situation that breaks the electron and SC model.

I have not heard any "crackpot" to distinguish between classical logic and mathematical one, because this is something only well studied people with background in logic and philosophy of science do. This was on of the hints that made me realize this guy is good, really good.

Science is always 80 years ahead of current discussion: https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426

We are talking about interdisciplinary physics here, it's the top rank.

It took me a year to really understand Stoyans Model. Now I'm in a paradox free, consistent world view with the fewest possible assumptions you can possible make. For me galaxies and the the universe as a whole, is the logical and deterministic consequence from the lowest number of fundamental particles you can have. The world became a very complex, deterministic machine of utter beauty.

I understand the fine structure constant, 137, relativity (I only can smile on your implementation of it), time, Newtonian mass, magnetic fields, planetary fields (origin), gravity, electron orbit conditions, the periodic table in it's fullest (why), quasars, pulsars, globular clusters, periodicity of the redshift, lyman alpha forest, black holes, super-massive black holes (totally different object), photons, beta-particles, ... the list goes on.

I understand the internal discrepancies inside the standard model, I know for a fact, that most parts of it are in fact falsified.

If you bring up a error in the math equations or a logical error in the theory of his, I would be glad to discuss this in detail. So far, I have not found a problem and in fact, came to the conclusion that this is the first model I can remotely accept as true, because it is complex and not complicated.

Just some weeks ago, another confirmation from a different model with quite close values was presented at a physics conference I attended. His was ~10^27 N/m² and in BSM its 1.3 * 10^26 N/m² of Vacuum pressure, a hidden variable in the standard model.

http://cosmology.info/

With the fractional quantum hall effect, it should be clear at the latest, that neither the common electron nor the BCS superconductivity model can be true.

I follow Stoyan Sargs "Basic Structures of Matter - Supergravitation Unified Theory" model, which has a very different understand of SC and solves most problems in physics.

Due the fact that the electron is also quite different, the FQHE becomes easily explained. The Electron is a open, complexly formed, 3 body object with internal oscillations. In a superconductor environment, the overall structure disintegrates and build a train of electron shells and positrons. Same happens under certain effects that "create positrons". According to BSM, you can't create positrons, only shoot them out of their electron shell.

Superconductivity is only a state of the vacuum in which the energy of the CL node is below a certain energy threshold, that sits between the parma and diamagnetic domains. Chapter 2, 3, 4 and 6 explain this in great detail. They are surely 200 pages together, so explaining the details enough for this to make sense is unfortunately outside the scope what a comment field can provide :)

If you wonder, the reaction of electron + positron creates a compound particle of electron + positron mass but neutral charge as well as photons. It's relative stable and quite hard to detect.

m is derived as

m = P_S / c² * V_fohs

P_S and V_fohs do not exist in the standard model. The gravitational microcuviture of protons/neutrons cause changes in the P_S (static vacuum pressure) that therefor changes the mass. P_S is around 1.3 * 10^26 N/m².

This is from the Basic Structures of Matter - Supergravitation Unified Theory model, not the standard model.

If you are so good, please explain me the black spot.

I just follow quite different, more classical model that is not invented by me.

What most people think is is a very bad truth function.

I care about the number of assumptions required for a model and the number of papers falsifying it. I don't care if a paper praises how good prediction X fits, you have a infinite number of models that predicted exactly the same value. But through falsification you can sieve out the wrong ones and guess what, most of the models commonly proposed as "truth" are long falsified. The standard model is not even logically sound and combined with GR/SR highly paradoxical.

They give 10 years warranty. I have quite some understanding in mechanical systems and it is well build, thick steel plates.

The point is this, sitting long in one position is bad for your back and general posterior. Of course you can change the rollers into static ones, but I wouldn't recommend it.

Cobalamin deficiency is a result of our prewashed food in wester society. Vitamin B12 is only created by bacteria on the surface of plants and excessive washing removes it.

Eat more dirt ;)

(I sometimes inject B12 IM due quite low blood levels detected last year. Regular intake of supplements should also do the trick).

Sure thing...

http://cosmology.info/database.html

Our track record is already embarrassing :) https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426

I had back problems from my crappy office chair that I used for more then a decade.

I searched for month for a good replacement, sat on every chair I found in nearly every furniture shop in town. After some month, I found the best chair I ever sat on, and it's by far, not the most expensive one ;)

http://www.officeline.se/products/hoganas-eco/

This one is the hit, you can unlock the base so you can use it in different heights. The backrest pressure you can adjust with a button, different locks and full flexible arm rests. I let everybody test sit on it who cares and I only heard excitement so far.

Combined with electric table I started to change my working position quite often and my back pain was gone after a month.

This one: https://www.amazon.de/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitati...

Never could have come up with such a brilliant theory, took me a year to understand it. Now I understand 137 ^^