HN user

plutaniano

50 karma
Posts0
Comments13
View on HN
No posts found.

The point is that they pay such low wages that their workers are still eligible for welfare when working there (despite being hugely profitable)

I'm not contesting this. This is a valid point.

This essentially means that tax dollars are subsidizing their profits.

I don't see how this would be the case.

Two scenarios:

1:

- Welfare is now $0/month

- Some people that could get by with welfare now can't. They start looking for jobs.

- Increase in the supply of workers.

- Decrease in wages. (good for amazon)

2:

- Welfare is now $3k/month

- Some people decide that it's no longer worth it to work. They'd rather just live off of welfare.

- Decrease in the supply of workers.

- Increase in wages. (bad for amazon)

As someone who lives in a country where pickpocketing and theft are really common: agreed.

If making an iCloud-locked iPhone and all of its parts useless is what it takes to make pickpocketing not worth it, i'm all for it.

418 I'm a teapot 3 years ago

I've seen a 418 response on a production system once... on a simple request that took 5 seconds to be fullfiled.

Building integrations for duct-taped legacy systems in finance is fun.

I'm a brazilian living in Brazil and I can't overstate how much of a game changer Pix is. The Brazilian Central Bank did an outstanding job.

Instant transactions, zero fees, available to anyone with a bank account.