HN user

planetzero

327 karma
Posts0
Comments233
View on HN
No posts found.

" So why did it not prevent spreading to Italy, a foreign country with a border, who even saw it coming 2 months in advance?"

Italy didn't ban travel early enough and their medical system couldn't keep up with the amount of people that ended up sick. The result is way more deaths and infections.

"If Italy (or the US) evidently could not prevent it despite freedom of speech and being a much higher barrier for spreading than internal China, then why do you still claim that freedom of speech could have prevented the spread in China?"

You need to actually do something when you are warned.

Italy didn't, the US did. Keeping things closed/no freedom of speech will only hurt everyone in the long run.

"Your image of China is a caricature, not reality."

Have you lived in China for long periods of time? Do you know anyone born in China? It's both for me. Most people don't truly know how evil the Chinese government is.

"Like I said in my other post: the claim that they "covered it up for months" is nonsense."

There was an outbreak, but it was covered up for many weeks. Doctors that came out were silenced by the government. Anyone talking about it on Chat platforms like Wechat were also censored.

"The US has had 2 months to prepare for COVID-19, and what happened in the US even though you had freedom of speech? Cover-ups, or -- a more charitable interpretation -- incompetence in information sharing."

Well. through January we were going through the shampeachment, which I think many people seem to forget about. This was keeping the government busy, when they should have been thinking about ways to combat the virus.

Trump banned flights to China early on. The mainstream press called him a racist after doing this. This is probably the single best thing that prevented large amounts of people from getting infected.

"Free speech is an important value. But don't pretend like it's some kind of panacea. You will do the ideal of freedom of speech much more justice by recognizing its limitations, because only then can you truly leverage its benefits while mitigating its weaknesses. Anything else is like driving with your eyes closed and thinking "I'll be fine"."

If Chinese citizens had the freedom of speech, we would have known about the virus much earlier and we might have actually been able to prevent the spread to countries like Italy.

I'm not sure why you are defending an authoritarian government that clearly prevented the world from knowing about a pandemic that has already killed thousands of people.

My guess is that you are one of the many people paid by the Chinese government to shill for them and spread propaganda.

"Your first paragraph makes clear why freedom of the press is necessary."

All press isn't being banned, just specific press from China. Our Freedom of the press is still in place.

I also don't really consider the press from China as the press when everything is filtered through the Chinese government.

" But it's hard to ignore the fact that in this country, when poor people make mistakes [or, in this case are the victims of circumstance], they typically eat those mistakes. Medical bankruptcies, unable to cover a $500 emergency, etc"

This may be the case. But would you rather have thousands of people without jobs in the airline industry and the many other jobs that will be lost as a result of the bankrupt airlines?

Bailing out these industries out is in essence allowing many people to keep their job.

I've been working from home for a decade. I've worked at many companies and been part of the hiring process for remote developers.

Most people just don't have the discipline to work remotely. I think productivity will be reduced overall and it might prevent remote working in the future.

"implied"

Did he imply or are you implying now because you don't like Trump?

Kind of like when he made a speech about illegal immigrants and the press implied that he was talking about all immigrants?

"Also, people were pedantic with Obama all the time. Tan suit, anyone?"

Obama was adored by the mainstream press and anyone that said a single negative thing about him was attacked and deemed a racist. Fast and Furious anyone? How about when he used the IRS to illegally target conservative groups?

60 million people were infected with H1N1 during his presidency and 13,000 people died in the US. Most people don't even remember this.

If you can't admit when Trump does something right, I sure as hell won't believe you when you tell me Trump is doing something wrong.

This might work. But how many people will die in the process? There are many cases of young people, with seemingly no prior health issues, dying after getting severe issues as a result of the virus.

On top of that, you can't guarantee that young people will only get it. With no travel restrictions, it can easily spread to the elderly.

"We are developing a tool to help triage individuals for Covid-19 testing. Verily is in the early stages of development, and planning to roll testing out in the Bay Area, with the hope of expanding more broadly over time"

yes, yes they are. They are building it for the Valley with the plan to expand nation wide.

Please stop with the politics. Trump can get something right.

Nobody was this pedantic with Obama. The difference is that Obama just wouldn't tell us what he was doing..and the press would ignore all of the terrible things going on behind the scenes.

[dead] 6 years ago

Please change the headline. His wife tested positive and he will not be tested because he is asymptomatic.

"being a junior engineer that works on isolated bits of work"

Most Junior engineers aren't working remotely. I've been working remotely for a decade with different companies and almost all of the developers on my teams have been mid-level to senior. The junior developers always struggled and had so many roadblocks, it made working remotely difficult.

It's really not that difficult to replace an in-person meeting with Webex voice call and/or screensharing. I go onsite once every 3 months for a couple of hours and it's all that's needed.

Our meetings regularly have 10+ people from different departments.

How ironic: A person railing against cancel culture gets cancelled by cancel culture.

Simply disagreeing with politically charged topics gets you a boot from many open source projects.

Many people that claim to want tolerance, actually want nothing less than exuberance for their own causes and have no problem painting people they disagree with as non-human, so they can harass, get them fired from their jobs or positions (canceling), and then finally silence.

This comes right out of the 'rules for radicals' playbook.

If you can't respect my freedom of speech, why should I protect yours?

I once worked for a small startup with 5 people and a boss obsessed with scrum and that only had experience in big corporations.

It was a remote development job with lots of meetings:

-1 hour standups daily -twice per week, 3 hour planning meetings on top of the daily standup -Friday we had a 'watercooler' meeting for an hour after the standup, where we were supposed to 'tell jokes' or 'share a funny story'. Since most of the developers were overseas and from different countries/cultural backgrounds, it usually ended up being very awkward. -twice/month we had a 4+ hour big-picture meeting on top of the daily standup

Sometimes, I would bill over half my weekly hours as meetings.

The strange part is that with all of these meetings, the tickets that would be assigned to me would be vague or filled with missing information. Even when I would have a 1-1 call with the boss to explain the ticket, she would talk in circles and could never give me the exact information I needed.

When I completed the ticket and didn't read her mind, things would have to be re-written.

I was eventually replaced by an overseas worker from India (the boss told me I was too expensive and she could hire someone from India for much less) and the company lost most of its investors within a few years.

Unless you're going to college for engineering, math, the sciences, or to become a doctor, college really isn't for learning.

It's for having fun and to some degree networking. If you can join a fraternity/sorority, your network will most likely get you a job right out of college.

I knew a guy that had jobs in the tech industry lined up after college for nothing more than knowing people in his frat.

He was running his own business and had very little hands-on experience and wouldn't have lasted a week at most of these jobs.

I, on the other hand, had at least 5 years of experience at that point (not to mention the decade prior to this of writing software as a hobby) and had to work pretty hard to get my first job.

Somehow, it doesn't seem fair. But it taught me that networking is equally or more important than experience and skill.

It's funny how the hobby that I had as a kid, which pretty much cost me nothing (aside from the cheap, used, laptop, I bought with my allowance) now makes me more money/year than most people that I know.

I really don't know how a bootcamp can teach you that much in 12 weeks. You might be able to cobble together a couple of react apps, but this will quickly fall apart when you run into problems/issues.

Why is everything you don't like a Russian Conspiracy?

Yet Bernie Sanders, who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and expressed his adoration of the country for years, is perfectly acceptable to run our country?

We could also solve many of these issues by having basic voter ID laws. But for some reason that's a problem too.

It's all Bullshit politics.