Then why not ask for gender while we are at it. And race as well.
Collecting data selectively is how discrimination starts.
But you are probably right, it's not illegal.
HN user
Then why not ask for gender while we are at it. And race as well.
Collecting data selectively is how discrimination starts.
But you are probably right, it's not illegal.
I doubt many 40+ programmers are going to come out in support of this article. In cases of discrimination, you are labeled a crybaby so it's better to just stay quite. HN is mostly young and the only 40+ ones here are the type who like puzzles or in top 1 percentile of programming (e.g. patio11). For a vast majority of 40+ programmers, the reality is as grim as painted in this article.
If you are not in top 1 percentile of programming abilities, you better move to management. This is hard for someone who isn't verbally aggressive. Positions for management require X years of managing Y employees so if didn't make the move early on, you are doomed. Given that there isn't a puzzle/test type of way to rank managers, the management positions get doled out as opposed to competed for. You have to be in the shoes of a 40+ programmer who is not in top 1 percentile to know this :-(
It's deplorable that people like PG insist on age as a criteria for the YC application :-(
YC application asks for age. Ageism?