onoffswitch

This seems a bit circular.

The universe (U) itself would be the prediction machine.

To be fair, there would be no definition of "circular" without the universe.

The reality we - or habitants from other universes or other domensions - can measure seems to be some kind of "Fractal collapsing" at the dimension/universe that the "measurer" is located.

---

Kind of related:

Dostoiévsk, in his book notes from underground proposes an interesting problem.

I paraphrase it below:

What would you do if you receive from god himself a manuscript of the actions (down to the minimum possible dt) that will maximize your "satisfaction function" considering all your life?

---

Rick and Morty also explored this using another analogy:

Psychologists are like horses in a caroussel trying to understand it's mechanism. They'll do their best, but in the end won't help much and feel terrified.

Not a true scotsman.

There's no point in saying that a signal is "noise like".

The signal maybe "noise like", but it should be a noise that has a distinct bandwitch from the "real noise"

The antialias filter just reduces the amplitude of the data collected (signal plus noise) in the exact frequencies that pertains to the bandwitch of the "real noise".

i.e you have to garantee that your desired signal has a different bandwitch than the noise. In that case, thermal noise must have this proprierty in comparison to neuron signals.

PS: English is not my first language. Sorry about any grammar or orthographical errors.

That was kind of his point.

Crypto sounds less like a revolution if markets treat it as an asset; as opposed to treating it as a currency.