HN user
That is a funny question (in the good sense). I would argue the VCs are cargo culting themselves, but of course another could argue that once the VC money has moved into the pockets of the programmers, then the important part of the process is done.
I just doesn't necessarily create any useful software.
It will be easier to see who were the useful idiots when the usefulness runs out.
How did it get dead?
There is funny business going on at manjaro, but by god do they deliver! I run 5 linux computers at home for various ends and I got tired of putting a new Ubuntu on them every now and then. At the time I looked at manjaro, other rolling distros couldn't even survive an update from the latest installation media to current (sidux). Arch is/was a hobby in itself and the opposite of what I was seeking, but it is an excellent foundation. Manjaro has kept these 5 machines for over 5 years through every possible update and it never broke them. Kernel switching is a joy. Driver installing switching is a joy. This is a very tall order.
That said I do hope endeavouros or others can fill Manjaro's immense boots.
pure noise? because you are always right, of course.
Funny how much a single question can be feared.
What was the state of r/The_Donald at the time?
Good job making all these accounts to congratulate yourself!
Even today the english wikipedia has articles that are full of lies, like for example the Gamergate article.test
jQuery, when people stop fucking around and start making sites that work again.
And that is not the only place knowledge gets locked behind:
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/chinas-devas...
So shooting the messenger is now a defensible position in polite company?
He is saying dynamic languages crash and burn in this context. Specifying "dynamic" does strongly suggest non-dynamic languages do not crash and burn in this context.
Of course, because security issues and language pitfalls have no bearing on cryptographic implementations.
Indeed it is much better to implement it in a language such as C or C++ that has historically had almost no security issues and has very few pitfalls.
That does not matter, nothing is above criticism.
Teenager with Asperger’s placed under house arrest, fined over £500 for asking police officer’s gender
https://caldronpool.com/teenager-with-aspergers-placed-under...
We have our skills, and the ability to implement anything that we can imagine (with the necessary detail). They can't take that away.
People like that have no place in software or any form of engineering.
I consider Tor to be completely compromised. Consider this:
1) Political entryism by ideologues. These people stand against merit, and these are the same people who every few weeks post a lead-balloon of a thread against it in this very forum and others.
2) Recent purge of non-aligned team members on trumped up bullshit that only offends the now-dominant political ideas
3) Large, long redesign with obvious flaws
4) Unwillingness to address the reported flaws
We are not talking about ICQ here, we are talking about Tor. If the Tor team is not concerned about this, then what are they concerned about? What else are they even doing? Why is it that in this age of total surveillance, when even Torvalds had to face the wall while they purged his team, nobody in power is bothered by Tor? Ain't that the fucking shit?
The problem is that the "something" that is "wrong" is wrongthing.
X has been going away for longer that the careers of most people on this site.
I guess we can soon expect them to relicense it all to free the world from the viral nature of the GPL.
Quick reminder that advisory locks may need to be released by the same connection that acquired them...
Not sure whether it can be argued if it is really a better alternative.
I suppose that when you watch your children die from climate change, then you will know.
Did you ever study Latin?
Not all moderation is Orwellian but there is moderation happening right now that is Orwellian.
Thank you but I will comment as I see fit.
Yes, the humans.