onceageek

I researched a patent examiner who was examining the software (algorithm) patent I was managing and not to my surprise had a pure bio/life science background!!!

He dismissed all the claims quoting basic statutes that it was not novel and cannot be patented. So the patent attorneys had to rebut the office action and ultimately ended up costing more (almost twice).

I understand you cannot have experts for all the technology specialties. For Ex. Even if you masters in EE, there are so many different fields in EE. For instance, if I am a MSEE and I focussed on IC processing, I might know the intricacies ( and innovative elements) of MEMS processing or wireless communication algorithms.

Having said that, most (of late some) patents have elements of novelty in it. So I wish the examiners have the basic background in reviewing the patents. This would ultimately reduce patent cost IMHO.

End of my Thursday rant.

"I was born brilliant. See what education did!" :)

jey: thats a valid point. I totally agree with your argument as it being a copyright violation too.

I disagree on copyright part. Two reasons: 1) You are not selling the agreement 2) It is impossible to find out from where or whose agreement (most of them are generic). Moreover, who the heck reads those!!! I am tempted to write in my ToS - that the users hereby agree to sell their soul for using my website :)

I agree on finding a legit free source.

I don't see any issue with copying the terms. Most of all End-user agreements and service policy are similar. Pay attention to substituting your company's name :)