odinduty

shortly after releasing their official mobile clients

???

I wonder if this will mean more and more servers are going to be sued. I've been playing on private servers since 2012, I play hours each day, and the future does not look very bright if this keeps happening I'm afraid...

Just two days ago I started my journey as a blood elf hunter :-)

The problem with private servers is that they seem to be addicted to OVH. I get it that it's cheap, has nice routes and usually they don't give a damn about what you host, but it's a single point of failure. I wonder if many of those servers are about to move to Ukraine (Russia) or something like that :-)

Ah, and believe me, some of them make ludicrous amounts of money, have paid employees, etc. It's not just a community. They all forked MaNGOS or TrinityCore and starting piling up their fixes on top of it (which they don't have to share because it's GPL, not AGPL), but some chose to pay their developers!

I'm happy to answer any questions about what it's like to play on private servers or how some stuff works in the technical side, or the community, or whatever!

Ah, the Twitter app for Android (beta version) recently added a feature that allows you to add a description to pictures you upload for impaired people.

All phone platforms are viable, it depends on what you expect from them...

I'm not sure, but I think WhatsApp stores your key and it sends it to your mobile so you can decrypt the backup you downloaded from Google. But you can disable backups...

Conversion is done by the devices I think.

Well, often they really think nothing will change because they were promised nothing will change.

And why not? A project is a project, and some twat who happens to have the keys to the Twitter account of that project should not define how you should feel about a community.

Nice ad.

Secure Boot [...] requires FOSS users to purchase a license from Microsoft

Nope.

I am just linking to the picture he has willingly uploaded to his profile, my dearest friend. He can take it down whenever he wants to. Please bite a pillow to ease the anger.

I don't think he was accusing you of anything.

They could hack into the iPad to make it display this: http://www.thecleverest.com/countdown.swf

High chance somebody gets shot.

And what's the practical difference between minimaxir#1667 and minimaxir1667, other than there's no "minimaxir" with no numbers?

I don't think he meant to say it was flawless, but I'm sure you agree it reduces the attack surface by a great deal.

Was that a security issue or just a crash?

For the record, the timebomb for 5.34 will go off on 2017-04-01, ie, shortly after stretch's expected release date.

Debian always providing with fun...

I wish all paywalls were like this: a modal I can remove with the developer tools.

And the Washington Post article clearly says, despite of that, that the April Fools day was banned. Read the title.

There's absolutely nothing in that post that makes me think it's an opinion piece or an editorial. It's a regular news entry, and a very misleading one, if not outright malicious.

I think there's a big difference between what that tweet says and having "banned April Fools". But what do I know :-)

Why not? Chrome released the RLZ library code...

Ah, that's good. Cordova is so horribly, horribly awful I am glad to see this happen.

What do you do to be turned down by 38 companies? Do you turn on your laptop and it's running Windows?

What do you mean by "normal Linux apps"? GTK+? Qt? Who'd want to use an application that is completely not optimised for a small touch screen?

We all know what he means by "Linux tablet", you don't really have to nitpick...

Oh God, haha. I also have that reflex of putting 's everywhere in URLs. I've found lots of surprises, but not many, to be honest. Not even 0.1% of times I've tried.

The ACLU is also a liberal association[1], although I agree liberals and conservatives work together in some issues. There's no doubt about it.

And yes, I think it's okay to reject them, because I am afraid of them gaining affection from everybody just to push an agenda later. If they wanted to herald digital freedom, they should have remained completely neutral in political issues, but they chose not to...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties_Union...

Of course, but he was quoting a "list of feminists", which I haven't clicked but I guess contains dozens or even hundreds of individuals, whose lives most likely don't revolve around feminism.

It's like saying that you're against John Stuart Mill or Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz because you dislike feminism[1].

I don't see why you'd have to be against a person just because they support a different point of view on some specific issue.