Not a native speaker and my scores are 20, 19, 19, 20 and 15 for a total of 93.
Maybe I should consider myself as one :)
HN user
Not a native speaker and my scores are 20, 19, 19, 20 and 15 for a total of 93.
Maybe I should consider myself as one :)
Can't. It'll be too expensive, I suspect, for mere speculation.
Thanks, makes sense now why they’re pushing for it.
I don’t have any background in finance, but what is stopping these companies from creating their own index and promoting it heavily? They have the market cap and the capital backing to do it I presume.
Probably it estimated future AI subscription costs.
Now you have a different problem to solve!
I was initially very surprised to see "The god of small things" in this list and even more so to see it at 32 in the list. But then, this is a list voted for by authors, critics and academics who are probably the only set where such books are popular.
Relevance?
I suspect something like this may already be in place.
As someone explained it below in this thread, walk into a mall with Bluetooth turned on and phone starts chiming with multiple "... wants to send you a media/audio/image etc." Not just ads, some bad actors would try to infect the phone with malware. Luckily never happened to me, but I heard from my acquaintances.
Yeah, but it stopped pretty soon stores figured out that they could flood you with advertisements over Bluetooth. In some places it was bad enough that I had to turn off Bluetooth.
The way I understood why it’s beneficial to switch your choice after the host opens a door showing you a goat is as below
Assume that door 1 has a goat , door 2 has a car and door 3 has a goat behind it. There are 3 trials possible in the Monty Hall scenario
Trial 1 Contestant chose door 1(which is a goat). Host opens door 3(because he has to) and asks if contestant would like to switch. If he switches, then he wins the !
Trial 2 Contestant chooses door 2, host can open door 1 or 3 doesn’t matter. Host asks contestant if he’d like to switch and if he does then he loses.
Trial 3 Contestant chooses door 3(which has a goat). Host opens door 1(he has to) and asks if contestant would like to switch to door 2. Contestant switches to door 2 and wins a cat!
So 2/3 times contestant wins when switching his/her original choice.
I see this every time I connect to my local library Wifi or Costco. I thought Captive was the name of the company providing this service. TIL.
Thanks for sharing this! I suspect that the salary listed for certified petitions may be capturing the upper end of the range of salary provided in the LCA for the job/position rather than the actual salary.
Yes. Pitfall of not reading the entire comment before responding.
Noted.
True, but does not help in this case with vintage parts.
Many prefer to be tipped in cash.
Why is this news?
If you have cash, it may be a good idea to buy in this small downturn. Though I expect there will be more buying opportunities in the coming year.
It’s not uncommon. Orkut back in the day was wildly popular in Latin America and India. WhatsApp is the same. I think users in NA have a lot of high quality options as against those in Asia and LatAm who don’t have much reliable options other than ones developed in NA.
13B it’s not entirely from treasuries. The breakdown is 7B from treasuries —> probably from the methods you described 5B from Gold —> believable if you notice how gold has done in 2024 1B from other sources. No idea what they are.
The article mentions that tether may not have been audited by a third party. So I’m not sure how believable these numbers are.
Handshake agreements will most likely fall apart in time due to changing needs and personalities. This is why contracts are absolutely needed, especially for the size of business Sriracha was involved in.
Except for the court ruling of 13 million in favor of Underwood Ranch, the article isn’t very clear in the amount by which the 2 companies disagreed so difficult to say if it was purely a clash of the 2 owner’s personalities or some other fundamental change in market that brought this sudden schism.
True. But a bubble is only confirmed once it bursts.
Given that market can remain crazy longer than I can remain solvent I’d rather be invested in it.
The kind of confidence that the author goes over in this article is rare. Such confidence generally comes from having a solid backing: financial, social, emotional, etc. Most people don’t have such backing.
Lucky are those who have such true confidence without much backing as that is truly a gift from nature.
When AAPL and NVDA breached the 3T mark I was convinced that they’ve hit a ceiling. But, time has shown that I was wrong. I think any valuation is possible now.
I wish my phone was just listening. It’s actually much worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43799802
There was a discussion last week about AI taking away entry level jobs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45052423
Maybe it hasn’t come for jobs that are not entry level yet.
So what were the same folks who downloaded Audio Hijack doing on versions 1.5 or older at the end of the 15 day trial period? Download it again?
It’s great that they were able to see higher revenues and take the company forward, but I’m wondering if there were additional features that were only on the paid version and not on trial version which helped with retention and growth.
I guess it's up to each individual or organization on how to interpret it. Some places may interpret it as the more controversial equality of outcome.