nubol

To don't share a solution goes against my ethical moral code. Sorry.

Yes, bias is not good for journalism, but also someone judging people by skin color or gender and not by merits should be excluded from communities that are meritocratic based, otherwise they will destroy us.

By her tweets I saw two orientations, anti white, female superiority. You can research and find them, in the world of tech, if I see someone with a lot of bias I tend to doubt of his/her quality as a journalist.

Obviously there is no legitimacy on declaring the independence in an unilateral way considering that the referendum was illegal. What is happening is pure "picaresca española" ;)

Funny that I got downvoted for saying that, I will say it again, it was not legal, and therefore because the lack of participation is not representing the opinion of the Catalans.

Yeah, maybe because it was not legal, anyway, it does not show in an accurate way the opinion of the Catalans.

In my opinion the referendum was not lawful because: 1- Was not legal, so the participation was low. 2- There were serious irregularities in the voting system.

I'm against the violence and I think that the independence of a region is something morally right, but I don't consider that the referendum 1-O legitimizes that the Govern of Catalunya declares the independence of Catalunya in an unilateral manner. I think the Catalan Govern is cheating in its own benefit.

Yeah, probably we will see progressively cases of people having anxiety and panics attacks because VR experiences, of course also the opposite, the "this is not my kind of game" will become a more serious statement.

If you think the automation is good, I guess one of the reasons is because it improves efficiency, then why to incentive a company to hire more humans?

Should a company be also subsidized by the government if it's reducing work accidents and reduces energy consumption(when introducing automation)? That subsidies would need to be payed by taxes from companies and citizens.

In my opinion the solution should not be to employ humans when a machine can do the job more efficiently, and introducing a new tax it could counter incentivize a company to introduce automation and that's exactly the opposite of whats desired. Since to introduce a new technology requires an investment and therefore risks for the company owners.

I think that once it is reached a point that it generates net unemployment, something that has not been the case for previous industrial revolutions, people should be able to reach products and production capacity at lower costs, so to be able to make a living being employed less hours.

"More human people should get jobs!"

Do you mean that the final goal is to end with the automation? Or do you mean new jobs generated because the transformation of the industries?

I don't find many articles talking about how AI integration in the industry could lower the production costs in many markets, that would allow consumers to be able to buy products cheaper, so they could work less to be able to pay basic stuff.

Also it would allow people to be more capable to scale multiple tasks, for instance: instead of being a taxi driver you become the manager of a driver less taxi.

Gibraltar is a good example on low tax rates to Spain.