nrdgrl

Most women's clothes don't have pockets...

Exactly. At the entry level end we should talk about the number of employees who end up on flaming out or on short term disability from the stress.

Especially a bin with tons of people standing really close to.

Yikes. Nope, I live in Canada and I had a few tens of thousands in debt forgiven. Definitely didn't have to pay taxes on it. That would be absolutely crazy and would have driven me to bankruptcy!

Answer a survey question to continue reading article...

It sounds like apple requires the data in JSON format - they may not have a choice.

Thank you for mansplaining that to me.

A $350 for an esthetily pleasing comfortable sturdy bra is a no brainier purchase when it's such a QoL improvement, you wear it everyday, and the alternative is a string of cheap bras that won't be that much cheaper in the long run and fit/feel worse.

Yes. You absolutely hit the nail on the head. I would _happily_ pay this much for a very comfortable bra, and it's reasonable given the quality of bras in the $100-200 range (I've owned several, although I got them at 50-75% off). That said I'll probably never be able to afford a $350 bra again in my life.

Also because every city gets to set their own consumption bylaws, many people who rent have nowhere to legally smoke it. eg: Calgary - public smoking is banned. You're allowed to smoke it in your own house. Except most rental companies have banned smoking on rental property (inside or outside). So the only way to smoke legally could get you evicted.

I think just about any woman knows, 20% is very low (and unlikely). From my own personal experience I'd be shocked if it wasn't clover to 60%.

I once drove the highway through the white sands missile range, 2 days in a row (tourist). I went through a DHS checkpoint twice where they checked my ID and asked detailed questions about where I was going and why. The second day they wanted to know why I had gone two days in a row. There are (where back then anyway) big barriers they would lower to close a portion of the highway during 'missile' tests.

A fascinating place to visit.

Perhaps we just found out?

I wonder if any of these chips ended up in electronic voting machines?

This account seems to be dedicated to only submitting this article to HN.

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=The%20software%20engineer%E2%8...

GDPR applies to all EU citizens. It doesn't matter if the citizen is accessing the web site from the eu or another country. Blocking people in the EU doesn't block all eu citizens from accessing your product/service.

That is the permit application fee (one time, $5,000) and reporting costs ($200 / year). They aren't paying for the water.

Rather than making blanket statements, here is the actual aquifer characteristics. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/wrd-nestle-attach-5-a... which is of course much more nuanced, and interesting than "it rains a lot".

The watershed and the associated aquifer are where the river water comes from

Yes, that's where it comes from, but it doesn't fill up instantly. Depending on the depth and type of aquifer the well is tapping, it could actually take a very long time for the aquifer to refill (or it could refill very quickly).

I don't know the particulars in this case but is Nestlé going to pay proper amount for this water?

This is just a permit to draw water from a well, not a municipal drinking water supply. I suspect that (other than the permit fee) they aren't paying anything for the water. (I had a look at the permit & didn't see anything there about payments).

Nope, they are pumping from the "White Pine Springs well". The aquifer likely refills at a much slower rate than the flow of the Muskegon River

Oh Kuro5hin. I miss blixco.

Given what we know now about the nsa, isn't it fairly safe to assume they _have_ been comprised?

I've walked under these dozens of times and never realized why they were there. I suspect most Calgarians have any clue.