HN user

nonissue

8 karma

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/andreww; my proof: https://keybase.io/andreww/sigs/IpNaGs8G75UCveKOFqXPE6Z7KIZg3hj-_jqZzGFSq3Y ]

Posts0
Comments9
View on HN
No posts found.

I know your comment is stale at this point, but my hammerspoon config is quite extensive.

Here's the Spoon I created for window management:

https://github.com/nonissue/hammerspoon/blob/main/_Spoons/Fe...

Essentially, `cmd + alt + left / right` resizes the frontmost window to 50% the screen width, and moves it to the specified side of the screen.

`alt + space` maximizes the frontmost window. `cmd + alt + ctrl + P` sends the frontmost window to your next screen, and you can repeat it to move windows between multiple monitors. I also have an undo function that lets you revert any of the window management actions you've taken.

Let me know if you have any questions / concerns!

My pretty extensive (but poorly organized) config:

https://github.com/nonissue/hammerspoon

Features include: - TOTP menubar app (that automatically types the code when clicked) - A menubar app for quickly changing screen resolution - A menubar sleep timer - Window management with convenient hot keys and undo functionality - Capslock rebinding to ESC when pressed alone, CTRL when pressed with other keys - A utility to allow you to both save a screenshot to disk AND have it copied to clipboard (AFAIK you can't do this natively in macOS).

There's other a bunch of other stuff, but those are the highlights. If you have any questions about it, please let me know! (email: andy@nonissue.org or open an issue on github).

I think what jack's saying is that "font-size" to some extent is arbitrary. It's not scientific or worthwhile to compare fonts across a specific size if they have different x-heights. The only meaningful comparison is to evaluate legibility for fonts that are "relatively" the same size. For example, if Interface 12pt is equivalent in x-height to Roboto at 12.5pt, and Roboto is more legible, and legibility is the goal, then obviously the user should pick Roboto at 12.5pt (all things considered).

It actually makes sense. If you think about it, if every external that anyone ever plugged in was backed up and then never seen again, that could be sooo much data. What if that drive was used, wiped, renamed and then used again? You potentially have the same drive on BB twice.

A way to alleviate the issue would be to charge a small fee per drive or per account for persistent external back ups. If it was 1-2$ a month extra for the peace of mind that a drive would always be backed up, I'd gladly pay it.

At the end of the day, you have a choice as a consumer and you went with bitcasa. I'm happy paying $5/m for unlimited backup for my main computer. All said and done it's an amazing deal, even when you consider the external drive issue.

Goddamn, created an account to reply to this. Can't believe how stupidly judgemental and absolute you're being. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking your time, thinking about this rationally and approaching it with a cool head. It's complicated, it's way more complicated than just "FIRE HIM." Your comment is ridiculous. Slow your roll. Don't just run around saying people need therapy.