nixdev

Glancing at this article you have posted, I am genuinely intrigued and look forward to reading it today or tomorrow.

The thing about the IgG4 topic overall, is it's not just a small handful of papers that are discussing it, along with other immune issues that have resulted from the mRNA shots.

It would be good to point out William Makis is a disgraced

Can you give us a solid citation on exactly how? I would like to see this.

He worked at a cancer center as a radiologist but continues to misrepresent his expertise as an oncologist.

This means he had a front row seat to how cancer develops in patients, how cancer is successfully neutralized (or not) in patients, and also the internal politics and realpolitik imperatives of such a place. Given that cancer is a multi-hundred billion dollar industry, and a patient cured or prevented from having the disease in the first place is not profitable, unironically his work history could provide insight into how institutions that employ fleets of oncologists actually operate.

The "fine people" hoax and "drink bleach" hoax are not open to interpretation, not by a long shot.

Even Snopes, fucking Snopes, confirmed the "fine people" thing is false.

Obama, Kamala, and Joe Biden all pushed "Trump said Nazis were fine people" with complete confidence, this is the literal definition of a hoax.

The original video credited with "drinking bleach", was Trump openly speculating on disinfection approaches. And, the approach he verbalized out loud, disinfecting lungs with UV light, was at the time a relatively new and completely valid medical treatment. Trump was ahead of the curve on that one.

Anyone who interprets his open questions about the UV light treatment as "drink bleach" is either a victim of a hoax (and an irresponsible moron) or has no qualms pushing hoaxes.

I did not miss this. I followed this closely as it happened. And this "gotcha" right here, that he does not have perfect memory of all of his text messages sent over the two years previous, was the most significant allegation that has been brought to light against him.

And, those text messages revealed nothing of substance, they had nothing to charge with him with. They didn't even attempt to charge him. They didn't even go after the supposed perjury charge because it was weak. If it wasn't weak, they would certainly go after him for it.

Nobody has a perfect memory of all text messages they have sent over the last couple of years. If you think you have a perfect memory of all text messages you have sent over the last couple of years, you don't understand your own memory. Let alone a guy who runs a business with 20+ employees reading a deluge of news articles and whitepapers from when he gets up to when he goes to sleep.

It's about giving over the documents that are requested by the other side.

Right, 100%. The point of contention is that documents that don't exist were demanded and those documents that don't exist are what the court claimed a default judgement over. This is per the court's own records.

the parents could not see that evidence.

What evidence do we believe we are talking about here? If this evidence was never entered into the trial, why should us spectators believe it existed?

the "consistent pattern of discovery abuse" (quoting the decision)

This here is what gives Alex ground to say "the court was on trial", in the greater context that an undercover journalist caught someone who works for the CIA on video admitting that the suits against Jones are lawfare. If you have not seen this video, you may not know how much information you are missing on this topic. If you dismiss the video because a particular group filmed the video, then we're not playing a game of mutually pursuing the truth here.

Throughout the entire process, Alex alleged a consistent pattern of discovery abuse on the part of the court. Deprivation of rights under color of law is a very serious crime that carries a 10+ year prison sentence. And yes, judges do sometimes have federal lawsuits filed against them for it.

caused harm to many families

The other major point of contention, is this was never demonstrated in court, let alone meaningfully argued in court.

He did this while knowing he was lying.

This also was never demonstrated. The court records don't show anything like this ; perhaps they show something like this on a procedural matter around discovery, but not anywhere on the topic of the supposed substance of the case.

and is now getting punished for it

The other so-called echo chambers, the ones that don't have a shadowbanning and censorship problem, the one one the side that won the majority vote in the recent election, don't see it this way at all.

[flagged]

womp womp

IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37243095/

What happened to 100%?

Pfizer/BioNTech says its Covid-19 vaccine is 100% effective and well tolerated in adolescents

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/31/health/pfizer-vaccine-adolesc...

"The mRNA injections" referred to the ones marketed for covid specifically.

I did not, and would not, dismiss the use of mRNA gene therapies (that's what it is), categorically.

this just sounds like my mum saying "I know this one doctor

By "legitimate" / "authoritative" voices, I am referring to "mainstream" media. I put "mainstream" in quotes because long-form podcasts and even Alex Jones himself have a larger audience than CNN/MSNBS etc.

I'll freely admit that I might have completely missed such an admission from a major authority - care to enlighten me please?

I respect this sincere pursuit of truth, very much so. I will leave this thread open in a tab and bring resources I am aware of to you in the near future.

"Someone harassed someone" and "someone else drew inspiration to harass someone from remarks" are wildly different things.

"hurr durr someone misspoke", lol no -- those are wildly different thing and someone just got called out for posting total horse shit.

May I introduce you to the concept of "incitement"?

Show me a single video clip where a sane and sober person could construe one of Alex's remarks to be "incitement". Pro tip: you CAN'T. We already know you fucking can't.

I'm just going to ask again for your definition of "real cloud"

Even from all the way over here, I infer that I think we're from so different worlds that what "real cloud" means to my side of the world isn't a part of your world.

What I can tell you, is AWS is the king of cloud, Google Cloud is a very very distant 2nd place, and Azure is an event more distant 3rd place.

and aren't oracle, I would not consider them worthy of trust either

Smart man.

supplements of a dubious nature

They are re-labled existing products that are sold in other places, and unironically already-recognized, before being re-labled by InfoWars, as very high quality.

If you're gonna criticize InfoWars you have my 100% support in your right to do so, but try not to post out of your ass. This is HackerNews, not Reddit.

Ignoring the influence Jones has on the public and fully executing the law

What "law" exactly do you think needs to be "executed"? Defamation laws? Were these defamation laws ever argued in court? Did you actually follow the trial?

The court claimed that Alex Jones didn't provide documents, documents that never existed, and defaulted him. The defamation laws were never argued in the court case. This action by the court is deprivation of rights, due process rights, under color of law. The judge is a criminal.

If the courts don't function properly, this creates an extremely dangerous climate.

and judicially 'adjudicated' of raping multiple women is a rapist.

Except for the hard material fact that he did not rape her.

While yes, it was more than ten years ago, we can see that such stupidity is woven into their DNA as a company.

TL;DR: where a cloud provider hosts customers for which there are real-world consequences for data leakage, not a single customer can be at-risk for data leakage. It's a different line of thinking, almost "a different world", to those who have this line of thinking vs those who do.

"The thing about reputations is you only have one".

By contrast even more than ten years before that, AWS was publishing whitepapers about how all contents of RAM to be used by a VM are initialized before a VM is provisioned, and other efforts to proactively scrub customer data.

I worked at a niche cloud provider a bit over ten years ago. We used Intel QAT for client-side encryption for our network attached pools of SSD. We were able to offer all-SSD at low cost and without security blindspots by crypto key rotation implemented by compartmentalized teams and also physical infrastructure compartmentalization patterns. Which, about half a decade later we found we were second only to AWS and almost second (but ahead of in other ways) to some smaller cloud-style hosting provider.

The "fine people" and "drinking bleach" hoaxes objectively showed us what side of yesterday's election is for the large part egregiously gullible.

Digital Ocean isn't really a "real" cloud. Maybe use Digital Ocean if you're hosting video game servers, but no serious business should be on it.

It takes alignment of a lot of unusual circumstances

Heh.. well.. California *was* majority white not even a decade and a half ago. And, the judge that put the final nail in on that issue for California wasn't exactly a white person.

So..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_California_Proposition_18...

convicted rapist

You may think you mean, or maybe you did not, the accurate description: adjudicated rapist. And that difference right there, between adjudicated and convicted, and all of the other ambient hoaxes, is in big part what the referendum yesterday was about.

Ask yourself how long it was between late 2017 and when you found out the "fine people" hoax was actually a hoax. Or if just now, whether you knew that even Snopes confirmed the hoax that Kamala wantonly repeated (as if it were true) in the debate is indeed a hoax.

Most normal people don't see the difference between adjudicated rapist and convicted rapist as an innocent mistake but as something that those who push such hoaxes -- rather than innocently parrot them out of ignorance -- should be put behind bars for in response to the damage they do this great union of states.

It's unpopular because developers want to have root access to their machines whilst being proudly ignorant to how fast the sensitive medical data or financial data they're working on can fly out of the machine.

Even when provided a means to instantiate virtual machines where they can have root access within the virtual machine, a lot of them will bitch.

Most of the demographic made out to be a "boogeyman" ie normal people, recognized DEI as "a license to hunt Republicans".

If you're a normal person and some random intern with a 10% non-American accent probably in their early 20s calls you from some random number greeting you by your full name and says they're a part of some polling company you wouldn't recognize even if you'd heard of it before, are you going to confess in the slightest to them you intend to vote for orange cheeto man who is like literally worse than mustache man from WW2?

Probably not.

You still think the news is real?

The larger voices on the more milquetoast side of the original "alt right" crowd who are still online and streaming push for two broad ideas to implement as policy: - any business that employs someone who is not a citizen of the federal government and also not a US National, forfeits their business - all welfare benefits for non-citizens cease

They believe that with these two major policies in place, most of the unlawful aliens will self-deport, and just considering human incentives on an elementary level, yes most of them will self-deport.

What do you propose we do about the volcanoes that in a single eruption emit more methane and carbon than human activity does over a span of two centuries?

Not having an unending war with a power armed with nuclear weapons appealed to voters.

You posses religious conditioning that makes you believe this. but your opinion/stance should not be projected on everyone else in the country.

Wow. Talk about projection. Roe, a case where the woman involved later admitted to lying about being raped, that case, the repeal of that case moves the opinion/stance back to the states, where it should be.

they can't even comprehend a situation where "live and let live" is possible

Funny someone in the "I NEED TO KILL MY BABY" crowd would write something like this. You people really have zero self awareness.

If you really care about the security of your email, run Qubes OS and use a qube dedicated to email separate from your other qubes.

  https://Qubes-OS.org

Heh, yeah. You gotta put in writing that only userlands defined in Nix will be eligible to enter any environment beyond "dev". And (also put in writing) that their performance in the role will be partly evaluated on their ability to reach out for help with Nix when they need it.

Personally - just let the developer own the machine they use for development.

Overall I agree with you that this is how it should be, but as DevOps working with so many development teams, I can tell you that too many developers know a language or two but beyond that barely know how to use a computer. Most developers (yes even most of the ones in Silicon Valley or the larger Bay Area) with Macbooks will smile and nod at when you tell them that Docker Desktop runs a virtual machine to run a copy of Linux to run oci images, and then not too much later reveal themselves to have been clueless.

Commenters on this site are generally expected to be in a different category. Just wanted to share that, as a seasoned DevOps pro, I can tell you it's pretty rough out there.

You can already do offline/lazy dedupe.

  zfs set mountpoint=foopy/foo /mnt/foo
  zfs set dedup=off  foopy/foo

  zfs set mountpoint=foopy/baz /mnt/baz
  zfs set dedup=on   foopy/baz

  mv /mnt/foo/bar /mnt/baz/

  https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/09/16/cb091697350736aae53afe4b548b9d43.jpg

ARIN and ICANN are centralized. WWW can run over alternative number and naming spaces but in practice doesn't do this except for Tor and to a much lesser extent i2p.

"www is already decentralized", okay but not in reality, not even a little bit.