HN user

newshackr

138 karma
Posts0
Comments52
View on HN
No posts found.
GPT-5.6 13 days ago

Perhaps the incentive is for variable behavior. When there is low GPU demand, burn more, but reduce when there is contention.

Killed by Apple 2 months ago

That is also the case for many of the products on the Google killed by lists.

What if you want someone to look at a portion of it but they don't know enough to approve the whole thing. They give +1

Someone else knows the other portion well and sees the +1 and decides to +2.

In practice this ends the stalemate where partial owners don't feel confident to approve the whole thing

Is this really the case though? Currently it appears to benefiting a small few and there is not much reason to think it will change going forward.

If 95% of jobs go away, the destabilization leads to violent conflicts, and power and wealth become more centralized does it really matter if we have better healthcare or automated cars? Will people have purpose in their lives? Will this be a better world for most?

The problem with a national climate disaster relief fund is that there is no incentive structure to push people to protect their property or migrate to less risky areas. We have areas that are destroyed every other year but people keep on rebuilding.

Perhaps as an alternative there could be a national fund with risk adjusted fees that is mandatory in cities that receive services.

Google also invests many billions of dollars to build their internet network and parts of the public Internet so it is hardly free