mslt

More importantly, the US isn’t the one welcoming someone holding a US passport, so the phrase is nonsense and reflects a complete lack of understanding or at least thought as to the purpose of the document

We can’t even make expensive versions of those goods

I’d suggest considering empathy once you get past the anger, their former selves would be equally repulsed by their behavior, and for many I expect their current selves feel similarly despite their lack of control. The villains here aren’t the broken people.

First search returned a Reddit post describing it as “Ruqqus was a "free speech" website. You were totally safe to say whatever you wanted there as long as you weren't a liberal or a Jew”

Good riddance

Nuclear arms and fentanyl come to mind as worse

It’s fine that a secondary consequence is them showing their foolish hand; I’ll give you that, but this not normal and should not just be absorbed as though it’s normal and that’s just what we call it now

Because they used millions of dollars of American citizens’ tax revenue to make a meaningless edgelord gesture, amongst a myriad of other reasons why it’s a bizarre and childish thing to do. Stopping there because this isn’t Reddit

Can we stop normalizing the bizarre and childish rename of the us defense department?

Out of curiosity what particular part of the original text needed to be polished and why couldn’t the writer accomplish said polish without a language model?

I’d recommend providing a lot more screenshots and information about how the core DAW functionality works in comparison to other DAWs. As is I can’t see enough about what this would feel like to spend my time downloading and trying it

One nitpicky detail is that the executives may be a rep for the customer/consumer, but are also very much reps for the shareholders and that’s a pretty big distinction

The part about his team is so obviously performative, as though he’s such a great leader he just couldn’t help himself from being a dick because someone was “speaking down to his team”

A mediocre PR staffer got paid a decent piece of money to find a way to frame ab outburst as heroic

Operating at a loss to buy market share is pretty much the norm at this point. Look behind the curtain at any “unicorn” for the past 3 decades and you’ll see VCs propping up losses until the general population has grown too dependent on the service to walk away when the pricing catches up to reality.

Apparently more people need to see more information about those things because they’re still happening

This is the actual answer to the whole question - accountability

Agreed. But giving adults free will is a principle of the market, so if attempting to prevent the most vulnerable consumers is the best we can get from a compromise, I’m for it

Hi OP! I’ll share what I mentioned below in hopes of a response from you directly, because I’m genuinely curious to hear what you think:

Seems like people should be of whatever age we consider mature before they start capturing intimate data about themselves on random platforms. If we don’t think you’re able to understand the risks of pursuing your reproductive impulses, do we think you can measure the risks of sharing data about those impulses on a platform you don’t control?

Local data or not, if I were the steward of a marketplace I’d use that position to create this kind of teaching moment for pre-developed consumers. If young people had been warned since the mid 2000s of how much of their intimacy they were handing over to Meta, ByteDance, etc. before they started, the world would certainly be better off.

Obviously not, pen and paper is the correct platform for a young person to document this type of data.

Not sarcasm, kids should truly just write this shit down instead of using a weird app that’s not accountable to them in any way,

“Partner Cycles” particularly describes a domestic surveillance situation that caters to an audience I’m not looking to spend time with

Seems like people should be of whatever age we consider mature before they start capturing intimate data about themselves on random platforms. If we don’t think you’re able to understand the risks of pursuing your reproductive impulses, do we think you can measure the risks of sharing data about those impulses on a platform you don’t control?

Local data or not, if I were the steward of a marketplace I’d use that position to create this kind of teaching moment for pre-developed consumers. If young people had been warned since the mid 2000s of how much of their intimacy they were handing over to Meta, ByteDance, etc. before they started, the world would certainly be better off.

Do you have recs? Particularly where I can buy epub without drm with a fairly rich catalogue across niche and more mainstream writings?

The browser version is limited in the ways you’d expect. The Mac OS native version is limited in ways you can’t comprehend. Until you realize they’re fighting apple for enterprise contracts.

Sorry you lost your mum, I’m in that club too.

The relentless sea may not transform them the way she did, but it will transform them nonetheless.

Might be a worthwhile ritual taking a handful to the shore and launching them out into earth’s great rock tumbler in her honor.

Or not; grief wears a new mask for each of us.

Not the commenter but in this instance it seems like if you want something you need to either be able make/maintain it or fund someone who will, no?

That’s called Journalism

You’re treating this article as an attack when it’s not one. She turned it on to see what would happen, because she’s a technology reporter, and then reported on what happened. And her reporting isn’t even all that negative.

Pointing out that something feels a little creepy, while explicitly stating that you don’t yuck other people’s yum is hardly “farming outrage.” We collectively need to have earnest conversations about how how emerging technologies affect our experiences, and her tone is pretty middle-of-the-road.

“Maybe?”

Regulating “false information?”

There was no false information and the substance of the clip is just video of a person responding to a question.

There’s clearly enough people who need to be told this, given any thread on this topic in recent years

This, people are talking oil sales as if this is just economics. This is Cold War.