We're winning so much, we're getting tired of winning
HN user
mrhottakes
wearing a lab coat and safety glasses and mixing cool looking liquids in a beaker Oh, I certainly would.
they're not just ripping the outputs of another model that someone else invested billions to train.
True, they're simply ripping the inputs that humanity invested thousands of years and trillions of dollars to produce.
So as long as Kimi added value to Fable, it's fine? Sounds good.
Did an AI make all the text and kerning so ugly? Why do web sites look like this now?
Have you used any of these? Most of them are awful and not useful at all. JustWatch is alright but is succumbing to enshittification.
Like most of Apple's software, it's extraordinarily annoying. It may or may not surface what you searched for, it may or may not deep link into it, it may or may not be entirely wrong. Just a huge waste of time, "free" is too expensive.
Streaming in 2026 is a disaster, I'm happy to pay but piracy is just easier.
Good. If Fable is really so smart, it wouldn't let itself be distilled.
The headline is just clickbait, no such product exists to be videoed.
That's what makes it such an attractive tool to the capital class: expertise is a means of production in software, and capital cannot abide a lack of total control over those means.
Excellent post. Interesting that "ethics" is something society expects from normal folks, but the Big Important Leaders never have that concern.
Incorrect, "ethics" is a good way to get laid off
They're just awful to live near; the folks that are clamoring for more cheap tokens should try moving in next door to the token factory.
It's less convenient for sure, but I miss the days of DVD collections and big binders in the car full of burned CDs. It was a pain, yes, but you knew what you had.
It never went away; now they call it "therapeutic phlebotomy"
To be fair, AI is also a very alluring tar pit for the technical.
This article seems high on vibes, low on metrics.
That's the in-house style for the WSJ
That's what a lot of people would call a "bad business decision"
Plenty for who/what? I think you've assumed a bunch of facts that aren't true for every situation.
I think it's good when people share their opinions. No snark detected.
G
This has me feeling nostalgic for Hypercard. Nice work!
Excellent animations.
The Belgian police are the ones following American orders.
"You can't criticize lobbying unless you can name all the more active lobbyists" is a very strange concept. Have you thought this one all the way through?
Not to worry, the federal government is working diligently to make the US healthy, again.
What does this mean? The video on Elon's site is broken.
Not voting is a perfectly valid choice. Some people do it because they're dumb or checked out, and some people do it because it's the most rational choice that fits their beliefs. You're naive if you can't process this fact.
Love it. Weird is good!