For example: isn't China supposed to be Communist?
No. It is state capitalism. The communist label is used in the same manner as the democratic label of the democratic people's republic of korea.
HN user
For example: isn't China supposed to be Communist?
No. It is state capitalism. The communist label is used in the same manner as the democratic label of the democratic people's republic of korea.
Actually he might. The way law is written, hackers are the closest thing to a terrorist. If Aaron Swartz is any indication, I expect an unfair ruling.
You are confusing communism with state capitalism.
I second the other comment. Fuck you, just, fuck you.
Presidents can pardon.
It isn't. It is state capitalism. It is still capitalism.
So that people will know. Titles are to inform, be descriptive.The way it reads, it sounds like a blog post.
You should have said that this is a book in the title.
Disappearing? You better think twice, everything is recorded publicly.
cry me a river?
Why is he a prick? He's always seemed nice to me.
You are now just arguing just to argue. Your response is irrelevant to the discussion.
And I think its truth is self-evident
Reads as if you are saying that nothing can convince you otherwise.
Mob opinions are correlated. People whose opinion differs from the mob, even are intimidated into either changing their opinion or, at the very least, remaining silent.
Voting is supposed to be secret. So I don't think what you say applies at all.
Not really. That's actually pretty tame. It's not like a death threat or something like that.
The outrage at those comments is quite surreal. I can't fathom for the life of me, why would the CEO of a company (and the commenters on the thread) would spend so much energy at being outraged by a RANDOM INTERNET COMMENT.
That. shit. is. INSANE.
But of course to the perpetually offended, no problem is too small or trivial not to be blown out of proportion.
The perpetually offended are becoming a powerful bunch.
I disagree. I don't think it is a stupid opinion to have. Feminists do not add anything of value to the tech industry, they never have, they never will.
The nice thing about computing is that everyone starts behind, but with a computer with Internet connection and the disposition to learn; You can get ahead.
Why do you say it is an excellent course? I started it and so far I found the professor to be uninspiring and the lectures lacking in preparation and detail.
I much rather read a book.
Words themselves have no meaning. The meaning is derived by the intention and context. It is perfectly correct to use nigger in some context. Just look at Louis CK or George Carlin. Actually George Carlin made a bit about the word nigger and he made pretty good arguments against the American obsession with "bad" words. The Americans have a very childish attitude towards this, I haven't seen any country were adults refer to words by their first letter.
As if somehow euphemism make everything ok, even though you say 'n$@!%r", you are still saying nigger.
He didn't say that.
Because it increased the knowledge of the domain you were developing for.
Which is precisely the article's main point. You can do those things because that knowledge will help you as a developer. That's why you can do those things, it doesn't mean you should do those things.
Coding is easy. Software Engineering + CS is hard.
Doesn't matter. Privacy is not about right or wrong, it is about privacy.
Political correctness is the oppression of our intellectual movement so no one says anything anymore just in case anyone else gets offended. What happens if you say that and someone gets offended? Well they can be offended, can’t they? What’s wrong with being offended? When did stick and stones may break my bones stop being relevant? Isn’t that what you teach children? He called me an idiot! Don’t worry about it, he’s a dick.
Now you have adults going “I was offended, I was offended and I have rights!” Well so what, be offended, nothing happens. You’re an adult, grow up, and deal with it. I was offended! Well, I don’t care! Nothing happens when you’re offended. “I went to the comedy show and the comedian said something about the lord, and I was offended, and when I woke up in the morning, I had leprosy."
Nothing Happens! “I want to live in a democracy but I never want to be offended again.” Well, then you’re an idiot.
How do you make a law about offending people? How do you make it an offense to offend people? Being offended is subjective. It has everything to do with you as an individual or a collective, or a group or a society or a community. Your moral conditioning, your religious beliefs. What offends me may not offend you. And you want to make laws about this? I’m offended when I see boy bands for god sake.
It’s a valid offense, I’m offended. They’re cooperate shills, posing as musicians to further a modeling career and frankly I’m disgusted.
- Steve Hughes.
To add, religion is an idea and ideas deserve no respect. It doesn't matter how much you choose to think that idea defines you personally.
Those greedy kids and their marshmallows.
In the context of the article.... self control correlates with an increase in obesity.
These things are supposed to be anonymous.