monadic2

Of course I'd be willing to pay for new train tracks. I've wasted days of my life in northern virginia waiting for the track to free up. And they wonder why nobody uses the train!

Speaking from personal experience working with these reputation warehouses and with handling a good deal of incoming and outgoing email volume, they aren't any more effective than other IP-based spam heuristics and if everyone configured their DKIM correctly these warehouses would be largely obsolete. I don't see a problem with crowdsourcing heuristic data per se, but email is a much narrower field than internet traffic at large and I can see a lot of the ways that poorly configured fail2ban type software could accidentally ban a lot of valid traffic.

Congressmen may not realize this.

I just don't get what there is to show off. It's a phone. It's not like you built the thing! People are willing to address that these phones are "beautiful", whatever that means, without acknowledging that the differentiation mostly has class and not taste connotations.

It was recently found to be unconstitutional by the supreme court, no? This seems to be asserting a stronger claim that it was also illegal then, not that it has since ceased.

I'm actually a big fan of Netflix exactly as you articulated you don't like it—if I have an empty head, I sit down and click through to find something to watch. Not currently subscribed, though, and I wish it came at a slightly lower price point as I don't watch the vast majority of netflix content.

The reason it's not good for kids is that the houses with enough space are either crazy expensive or far from work. Trust me if I could afford it I would love to live in SF.

Also—I just found this out a month ago—a "nutritionist" is not the same thing as a dietitian, which is licensed. I had assumed these were one and the same.

I mean there's a lot of problems with patenting manufacturing processes. How do you argue this is a solid model for growing fruit?

I've found that an effective way to bypass recruiters and advocate for employment with your personal projects is to a) aim at small companies and b) cold-email with a cover letter. YMMV.

Depends entirely on threat model. More code is more surface area for vulnerabilities to be found.

Why would you ask for permission?

Reminds me of the joke "a man was selling books on the corner entitled 'how to become a millionaire'. Naturally, I bought one—turns out the trick is to sell a million books for a dollar."

...why not both? Obviously we would still need a green new deal even with massive nuclear investment.

Is that zip code itself famous?

Edit: this is referring to a popular 90s american television teen drama.

It doesn't refer to anything that I am aware, it simply has the connotation of "looping" back, much like "doing a double take".

That's a problem for mathml. The more required tooling, the less likely it is to be used. TeX hits this weird sweet spot between writing code and writing a document that's very productive.

There are plenty of alternatives. People don't use them.

No, they seem explicitly designed to avoid interactive use an end user.

True, but this seems distracting from the point that 99% of people have terrible telecommuting lighting.

Still tripping at how clueless you're pretending to be. Grow the fuck up and take responsibility for your view of the world.

Ad fraud is when you scheme to get clicks on your own site to defraud the ad network that would pay you for the space you sold them. It is not relevant here unless you're using the extension on your own site.

That leads to the natural conclusion that only people valued by those in power will see society's benefits. That's not a society I want to live in.

I'm willing to negotiate. Starting offer: fuck your payment processor entirely.

Am I missing something? FAANG obviously omits a bunch of relevant large tech companies and it's rather disingenuous to be confused at its omission when the acronym obviously doesn't have an M in it. Feigning stupidity to make a point against a straw man is both juvenile behavior and evidently derailed the thread from civil or productive conversation. That's a successful troll, my friend, not any kind of behavior that aligns with the community guidelines.

Thinking about crates this way is a revelation to me. Is there any tooling to make analyzing dependencies as you did easier?

How is this kind of juvenile behavior accepted on this forum?

How do you have any clue what users want? How are you confident that what you value is what others value? I suspect most people are informed what they want via commercials and would probably be open to other ways of integrating electronics and services than the ones beneficial to the few players we all know and use.

There's nothing precluding the legal analysis you've outlined from stemming from a poor understanding of the underlying technology. Just because the legal reasoning is internally sound doesn't mean the resulting narrative makes any sense when applied to reality, and it hardly is the only possible internally sound judgement. There is plenty of room for arbitrary semantics (and I would argue actively harmful and ignorant semantics) to dominate the resulting judgement.

Presumably they'll end of life the car at some point and repair will shift to third party shops. Do they have access to the internals of the car?