HN user

mike00632

885 karma
Posts0
Comments708
View on HN
No posts found.
GPT-4o 2 years ago

Does anyone else, when writing comments, feel that you need to add a special touch to somehow make it clear that a human wrote it?

GPT-4o 2 years ago

I have never tried GPT-4 because I don't pay for it. I'm really looking forward to GPT-4o being released to free tier users.

GPT-4o 2 years ago

I was shocked at how quickly and naturally they were able to correct the situation.

Gemini AI 3 years ago

I've had the same experience. Now ChatGPT is my go-to.

I often paste error messages with context into the chat and ask what's wrong.

I just asked Chat GPT 3.5 the following: "Please give an exponential equation that has integer solutions which is difficult to solve.", and the response is: "

Certainly, here's an exponential equation that can be challenging to solve for integer solutions:

2^x+3^y=7^z

This equation involves three variables, x, y, and z, and requires finding integer values for these variables that satisfy the equation. This type of equation is known as a Diophantine equation, and solving it can be quite challenging, especially for larger values of x, y, and z.

"

How much resources are required is directly related to the memory size devoted to each weight. If the weights are stored as 32-bit floating points then each weight is 32 bits which adds up when we are talking about billions of weights. But if the weights are first converted to 16-bit floating point numbers (precise to fewer decimal places) then fewer resources are needed to store and compute the numbers. Research has shown that simply chopping off some of the precision of the weights still yields good AI performance in many cases.

Note too that the numbers are standardized, e.g. floats are defined by IEEE 754 standard. Numbers in this format have specialized hardware to do math with them, so when considering which number format to use it's difficult to get outside of the established ones (foat32, float16, int8).

I have very similar thoughts, especially when I compare the Metaverse spots to the products that video game companies make for way less money that are comparably much better. I guess video game companies have a reputation for over-working and under-paying their employees though.

You criticized Chinese tech companies for being incubated in a walled garden but then criticize TikTok for being subject to US government regulations in the American market? Shouldn't you also give Facebook the same criticism? The only place where Facebook is still experiencing substantial growth is India where their government banned TikTok. It seems to me like TikTok is the real international competitor.

Yes, exactly. Then you could write popular opinion books about the studies which flesh out the conclusion. Then it could be a motivating tool for an entire political party. You could go on tour to promote your "controversial" books. People will say that the facts must be heard and both sides should be represented.

Trans people are literally being murdered. Kids are kicked out of their homes for being trans. The Republican party is currently centering their platform on hatred towards trans people, blaming them for all societal woes. There are now laws being enacted that ban trans people from public places. Yet you not see how this could discourage people from coming out as trans?

You had to cite an obscure Swedish article to characterize medical care for children as negative? Pathetic.

Why not just trust doctors? Let medical professionals make the decision? How about considering the children you want to hurt instead of your feelings about whether trans people are icky.

1. Many parents are not fine with trans children. By suggesting that trans children are welcome you are ignoring the very real problems that the Conservative monsters are currently inflicting on them.

2. They benefit from having extra time to make a decision. When you (unnaturally, via the force of law) block children from receiving medical care then you cause them to develop sex characteristics that don't belong to them. If you think about it, you are doing to these children much worse than anything you are suggesting trans advocates are doing.

Sounds like you're trying to censor information by dismissing the left/right hand hypothesis as "unrealistically stretched".

To put it another way: the way you feel about studying handedness being linked to COVID is the way I feel about studying an assumed link between race and "intelligence". It's not "otherwise interesting" at all. It's ignorant at best.