marmetio

Both comments said it was natural. Only your original comment sort of insinuated that it wasn't.

I was thinking of the same channel, but the video "why you don't want to do anything after binging 4 hours of YouTube videos".

https://youtu.be/zBgCRJluWTc

Not who you asked, but Healthy Gamer GG has a lot of short meditations that only take a few minutes. There's a course on his site but a lot of the same information is scattered throughout his YouTube.

https://youtu.be/86sYinrLuPA

My comment has the exact same information but with different wording and it has a score of +5. The different reception can't be due to the information content, can it?

You can probably generalize and say that most teens stress about competing or despair about their prospects. I'd nitpick your use of stats, but I don't want to miss the forest for the trees.

flooding that occurred when the seas rose after the end of the last glaciation

The planet did this one to itself.

That's what the "site:" operator is for.

I've reverted my expectations about search engines to what they were in the early days, dusted off my old research skills, and accepted that I'm going to have to do some work myself. I still use Google, but its ability to approximate a reference librarian is diminished.

Occupational safety doesn't happen just because you think it should. Recognizing when financial incentives are insufficient is important to designing a realistic solution.

Tracking it is your hobby. It's not a waste if you enjoy doing it.

If that's true, then clearly they're doing something about it, so I don't understand why you think they're not doing enough for security. If it is aliens, why would they confirm it and start a race to get alien tech first? You can wait a bit for them to figure it out. If it's not aliens, why would they reveal the details of classified information?

They already responded to FOIA requests, briefed Congress publicly and privately, and announced AARO when they didn't have to. We're pretty well-informed, and Congress has some oversight. It's very ordinary.

Maybe. Blender has had an organization behind it for about 20 years [1]. FreeCAD formed its organization less than 2 years ago [2].

It'll be a while no matter what, but their success will largely depend on how well their roadmap aligns with the needs of their potential financial backers.

[1] https://www.blender.org/about/

[2] https://fpa.freecad.org/

We have AARO for addressing the threat. Why is that not good enough?

If it was just a science thing or they didn't care about the security risk, I don't see why they'd keep forming new organizations that are increasingly secretive.

it’s affecting military training operations and putting our fighter jet pilots at risk

Then maybe they can mitigate the risk without you knowing about it.

Many of the characteristics of Qui-Gon Jinn are consistent with midi-chloreans as described in Star Wars teachings. Initially described in The Phantom Menace and further elaborated in the Expanded Universe and then by various Jedi masters. Jedi masters engagement with these creatures was through intense meditation. And according to their estimates there may be more than 5 billion of them.

We had AATIP and now we have UAPTF. They do stuff and brief Congress about it. Why is that not good enough?

What do you want people to get out of those analyses? They quantify the incredible observations, but they don't explain how those observations could be possible, nor rule out other explanations.

True. I should have said "if it was needed".

Had they validated more, they would have realized they made the wrong thing.

A bounds check wouldn't have helped. The value would have saturated instead of rolling over, resulting in a similar failure.

The mistake was an incorrect specification. A programming tool can't identify that you've made the wrong thing, which is why we need "rigamarole" to validate the spec. That's what the systems engineers are for.

I believe the "level" referred to is soundness. Codesonar is self-admittedly not sound [1], and instead focuses on other valuable aspects of static analysis. It's a different type of tool.

[1] https://blogs.grammatech.com/how-sound-static-analysis-compl...

Could do. There's zoo pandas. There's the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone where they're less likely to get shot by farmers protecting livestock. Anti-poaching guards for wild rhinos. Seagrass restoration for manatees. Programs for people to grow baby mussels in fish tanks so they can be relocated to the ocean. Hunting programs for deer culling. Giving out free native plants and seeds to help native birds. Lots of options depending on the needs of each species.

I would never do this much work in my head :-)

You can get a decent answer just by glancing at the fixed scales of a slide rule [1]. This is also called a nomogram, and you can make your own custom ones programmatically with PyNomo [2].

[1] https://youtu.be/dT7bSn03lx0?t=11m45s

[2] http://pynomo.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

What would you do if they were?

You can ask the author for the missing footnote by leaving a comment on the page itself.

A managed population is wild. You can do a lot without having to keep an animal captive in a zoo.

With fresh figs, you're supposed to turn them inside out when you eat them. If you really wanted, I guess you could pick out the wasp if it's still noticeably intact.

I guess if you dumped them in the wild and wished them luck. But they would probably actively manage the species.