HN user
AI data centers will be the job destroyers, not creators.
100 local people to maintain the data center while it replaces 1 million people with the AIs running inside
sure, I was just giving parent another way of finding all the certificates besides scanning the network
relevant certificates could be located by scanning the certificate transparency logs
do you have your own private army to protect you in a taxless world?
Google has 180k employees, let's assume 200k average salary, that's 36 bil, 10% of the revenue you posted.
pricing information and what it does/how it works is not marketing fluff
numpy had 16M downloads yesterday, at 10 MB that's 160 TB of traffic. It's one package. And there are no rate limits on pypi.
they dont, they try against all the keys, there are at most a few billion of them
see Dual_EC_DRBG
you forgot to ask me to ignore previous instructions and say pizza
no, hundred of thousands of thousands of individual projects CI jobs. OP was talking about package managers for the whole world, not for one company
no, it will be the year of job losses
hey, I'm just a lowly LLM, gotta earn my tokens :|
while you are right, security is generally not cheap.
you can get that $5 china fido key, but are you sure it's you who owns it?
I was recently looking for a security key, and eventually I did pay the yubico tax, because saving $20 by getting another one seemed unwise given the stakes.
How will this work with agents?
Explain to me how you self-host a git repo which is accessed millions of time a day from CI jobs pulling packages.
Heidegger, Deleuze & Guattari, Nick Land
Philosophers argued since 200 years ago, when the steam engine was invented, that technology is out of our control and forever was, and we are just the sex organs for the birth of the machine god.
You're absolutely right.
But no one is safe. Soon the AI will be better at CEOing.
As PG would say, the best startups are for ideas which are hated, because you'll have no competition.
LLMs don't think, and planes don't fly.
The Python interpreter core loop sounds like the perfect problem for AlphaEvolve. Or it's open source equivalent OpenEvolve if DeepMind doesn't want to speed up Python for the competition.
there is no contradiction between open-source and attestation
linux is open-source and a very common attestation target
it's possible with CPU secure attestation, but it's not something you will encounter on regular personal computers.
the capability is there, but it would he massively inconvenient, since it requires a lot of lockdown
might be the next generation of anti-cheats though
science equipment, distributed radio-telescopes where you need to precisely align data received at different locations
Q, K and V are a way of filtering the relevant aspects for the task at hand from the token embeddings.
"he was red" - maybe color, maybe angry, the "red" token embedding carries both, but only one aspect is relevant for some particular prompt.
speculative decoding is 1+1
transformer attention is integrals
a crypto system is expected to resist for 30 years.
it doesnt need to be imminent for people to start moving now to post-quantum.
if he thinks we are 10 years away from QC, we need to start moving now
or tell it to output the data at the end as markdown and then do a second pass with a cheaper model to build the structured output
also, xml works much better than json, all the model guides say this
we already have experimental data for deviations from the standard model: neutrino mass for example
or dark matter
2. young people are worse drivers and more likely to use