I really liked that feature. Also being able to write check functions for your function.
HN user
lycos1
It seems to be: Jai
Is there any technological basis for this being cryptographic? I couldn't find any, or am I missing the part where it is an artistic statement. Just knowing the language of the message is enough to use frequency analysis to crack the message.
This isn't a particularly good idea for competent readers who typically scan entire blocks of sentences at a time. The scrolling effect just slows them down.
Please don't link to w3schools. Thanks http://w3fools.com/
Yes I found this statement interesting too.. wonder what issues he takes with chrome. I find my taste is opposite: firefox for development and chrome for regular browsing.
We're definitely in a bubble with these valuations!
So much for the open web.
you mean... "I doubt that Microsoft will Eclipse the future of .NET" (Erich Gamma lead on Eclipse dev team)
This looks like a fun alternative to the typical weekend hackathon. I'll give it a whirl.