llelouch

Fable is the clearly best when you have to do real coding.

True but Noam brown (openai researcher) said that in 2 years AI will start creating new math.

Professionals still use figmas. Claude design jsut expanded the space. Non-design specialized use Claude design now.

If Altman wasn't such a liar anthropic wouldn't exist.

Still avialable through the API. According to people that have tried both Fable nad 5.6, Fable is clearly better at coding. So i expect a lot of people to pay extra for it.

Dario tells the truth. If you look at everything through their safe AGI mission it all makes sense. They are not bs'ing about that. Also I think most people just read headlines or 10 second clips and make false extrapolations from there.

(BTW Anthropic only exists because Sam Altman is a liar, Dario admitted this.)

There has been an anti anthropic propaganda push by bad actors across social media sites especially Reddit and twitter. This started a few months ago when anthropic started beating openai.

Anthropic themselves argued that the technology is dangerous.

They never released mythos 5 to the general public. And they never will.

Please explain. Do you think Altman wanted this to catch-up?

Sam Altman was doing interviews talking about p(doom). They all were requesting regulation just not this opaque ad hoc kind.

Seems like it hasn't been applied to openai. Anthropic can't even release this to partners. Openai can. I wonder why.

There are many people in this administration invested in OpenAI like the Kushner's. They are attacking Anthropic however they can. You will notice a lot of propaganda on social media sites against anthropic. It's very obvious.

"The government should have the power to block or deter deployment of the model if it is determined, in light of third-party assessment, to present unacceptable risks. This power must be scoped to the above four specific risks and there must be protective measures against political favoritism or arbitrary decisions."

You are wrong.

Read in full here https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential.

I know you won't though. haha.

Dude, have people not realized there are a lot of anti-anthropic propaganda every since OpenAI started losing. It's all over reddit and twitter. So many bots.

OpenAI will eventually catch up and be banned as well.

" We have reviewed a report that we believe is the basis of the government's directive and validated that the level of capability displayed there is widely available from other models (including OpenAI’s GPT-5.5)"

The administration just doesn't like anthropic. OpenAI is in bed with the trump Administration.

He asked for an independent body.

Requiem would be pretty cool for ASI.

They din't get as much pushback because they aren't the leader.

I don't think you know the people working at anthropic. They truly believe this. I think someone people are so used to people like Altman they think everyone else is like him.

What's the alternative? Not release the model at all?

"Make the guardrails better" isn't very hard and probably not worth the effort.

what paper?

The key distinction is that chess players compete against each other, whereas mathematicians engage in a dialogue with mathematics itself.

Actually, for most things (not PHD research level) you will learn more from the first approach. Getting answer directly means you can use the rest of the "free" time to integrate new knowledge into prior knowledge and review the information into long term memory.

This is why Sam Altman keeps releasing things a few days before Deepmind. He is worried Google will overtake them more so than other companies.

Active does better much better. If you know how the price moves you can easily beat the market.

Kind of reminds me of the evolution of bureaucracies

Maybe try the supermemo discord.

Anthropic guys also wanted Altman gone. He is not well liked by upper management it seems.

Probably Ilya and his team. The recent discovery was made by him and his team. "The technical breakthrough, spearheaded by OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever"

Trading isn't about knowing the future. It's about having a positive expected value.