lispre

Thanks for your comments, I will stick to optimizing my ugly code for the people who love small and tiny things

The first reflection of many people on this post is that we already have tools like grep, ag, pt, ripgrep and so on, why you create a more junk thing. my answer is as followed: 1. I just need a simpler and more direct thing, just like "ls" has a lot of options, but I use the most high-frequency only ls, ls -l, ls -la, so every high-frequency use form Have been aliased, I use the highest frequency of grep is the recursive subdirectory search, very high frequency so that I want to create a tool to do only this thing, and do the fastest and best directly

2. In order to rewrite with Rust, I love C, Ada, Zig, and I want to taste Rust now.

No, it is still bad.

Rust is not for good c/c++ programmer. It is for those who is not familiar with c/c++ but have some knowledge with functional programming.

As a C++ programmer, you can try golang instead of for productive

Rust is not for common project. Rust is only for safety.

I just recommend modern C++ and golang

Just as the data offered by this article, the best choice for the practical job right now should be Golang and OCaml.

if you don't love the two, just try C/C++.

Really? Picolisp was build with asm? not C as SBCL