HN user
No, they don't. Methamphetamine and amphetamines are quite different. Methamphetamine is neurotoxic and crosses the blood brain barrier at twice the rate that amphetamines do. Equating the two is misleading, wrong, and will create stigma
Churchill was one of them
Strain on the eyes and blue light, iirc, suppresses a hormone related to sleep. Been wearing a pair for the past two years after a coworker recommended them after I mentioned my eyes always feel super strained by the end of the day and have trouble sleeping. They really do make a huge difference.
Before, my eyes were super heavy and aching by the end of the day, and now they feel as though only an hour of screen time has passed. Thing is if I take them off while working/looking at any screen without a blue light filter, they start aching within 10 minutes :/
Sorry if it isn't obvious and I come off as clueless for asking, but is this to gauge bureaucracy?
After interviewing everyone from a professional juggler to a building surveyor who worked out of a garden shed, Holliss found some common disadvantages and negative impacts: mental health suffered (anxiety, stress, depression), isolation was rife (not being in a team), and it was hard to have self-discipline (proximity of the fridge and biscuit tin; not enough exercise; difficulty in setting boundaries between work and life).
My working from home experience has been the complete opposite. In fact, these tend to be "negative impacts" I've experienced in open-office environments.
This. Just to add, aspergers isn't something that can be turned on or off at will, unlike x-ray vision.
Does it still hold that SSDs are harder to recover data from than HDDs? Or is that out the window?
Lol, nah been logged in for sometime, came across your wonderful comment, and found it funny that the internet white knight stereotype exists at this extreme. In this case, someone willingly narcing on a mega corporation's behalf, for no compensation, over little damage to said mega corporation monetarily/competition-wise, and only to serve what they see as being just and proportional consequences (in reality overblown) to a fellow HN member
You volunteer your time to police HN threads in the name of monopolies who carry out the same shit. Great job!
Similar experience. It's why I can't stand to listen to Led Zeppelin and absolutely despise showtunes...
Being stuck on the subway several times a week with 1 or more people playing bass dependent music/game audio through their phone speakers... shoot me now.
Thanks man, I appreciate your feedback!
Thank you for raising this usability issue! Definitely noting that for the next round of updates
By no means is it in the category of best, but I like to think it's at least fun.
It's missing an about section, but that's because I wanted to experiment with my site, work, and resume speaking for who I am over marketing copy. Affects SEO and likely perception, but I built this recently for a grad school application. If rejected will begin applying for a new job/seek new/clients, and am curious to see how receptive it is then. If it performs poorly then, then a new iteration will be made.
Last note, it's not optimized/built for mobile as of now, so points off for that :/
Not to mention they paid nothing in federal taxes
What made you switch to development?
Low unemployment is good for obvious reasons, but like the inverting of the yield curve rate, it's been a predictor of the last few recessions. After it bottoms and starts to move into an upwards trend a recession tends to follow.
All I know is that I'm in a good place with my experience in finance and my gains, and was just trying to share information. And fyi, the information shared isn't "mine", it's what's used in the industry, and the measurements outside of technical indicators are used by the Treasury Department.
But whatever works for you man.
Not peddling, just offering insight from someone who has experience in this field. Sure no one can time the market, but they can use techniques to assist in their decision making.
If you're an American, the number isn't 10%. 32% of Americans have a 401k. So 32% are investing and a solid portion let their 401k management bank make decisions for them/go by the typical advice given, by bank reps, of "aggressive portfolio when you're young" (majority stocks), "moderate when you reach middle age" (mix of stocks and treasury bonds), "conservative when you're older" (mostly treasury bonds).
If you're younger and signs are pointing to the market crashing within a year or two, your management bank is going to advise on this and tell investors to move their money to cash (if there's even a cash option) or to treasury bonds. No, it's up to the investor to make a decision based on their own research/reading of the signs. Hell, these banks even use dark patterns to make it more difficult for investors to manually control their own portfolio, leading to users giving up on finding or thinking that they can't manage their portfolio and leave it up to the banks to do so.
There are signs for when things aren't going so well and things are going to take a turn for the worst soon. Certain indicators can help with gauging this. No where near being 100% accurate, maybe 52% accurate, but that's still an edge. On top of certain indicators, monitoring quarterly GDP, yield curve rates, unemployment rates, home owners rates, among other stats, help to show what lies ahead. If one can get out some months before a crash, then great, it's likely that they didn't get out at the peak of the market cycle, but at least they likely saved their 401k from a 20% drop. And in the case that they did move to a cash option at the peak, then they likely saved themselves from a loss of between 40%-60%. If cash isn't an option, then likely saved around a 35-40% loss.
Investing blindly isn't a good strategy no matter how one looks at it, but learning what to look and monitoring periodically can help in preventing catastrophic losses
Of course, glad to share resources/information.
I would add, for US markets, keep an eye on Treasury yield curve rates and look for inversions between shorter time frames and longer time frames. This has been an indicator which has preceded the last 9 US market crashes.
The bottoming of unemployment numbers and the start of a turn upwards has also been a signal.
https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/yieldcurve.php
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/i...
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2016/article/unemployment-rate-...
And this imaginary "Bob" still lost a ton of potential gains and psychological trauma because of his poor timing. He did not come ahead of the 90% of investors, he was in the 90%.
Investing blindly in any market is a terrible idea and ignorant advice. Buying and holding is a terrible strategy, especially during crashes or leads up to crashes. "Bob" invested at the peaks of four market cycles and suffered heavy losses of nearly 50% with each subsequent crash. He could have nearly 50% more in gains had he taken the time to read the signs.
Anyone in their right mind would be livid had they just invested a nice chunk of their hard earned pay, only to lose 50% of it in the following month. Best bet to dodge these avoidable pitfalls, is to hold off on dropping money into investments until you feel comfortable enough with assessing markets. Then make an informed decision on what to invest in , instead of throwing shit at a wall to see what sticks
Rather than be dismissive, present your case. Moving averages and rsi are not the same as drawing arbitrary triangles. They actually measure trends in buying, selling, and price movements over a given period. And if you actually look at the 20,50,200 day moving averages for major indexes, you'll see significant moves in price where golden and death crosses occurred. They're legitimate indicators and used by professional traders within the finance industry
If you're considering following the suggestions of investing in the stock market, hold off until a possible Brexit market reaction passes in March.
Also, wait to see if the S&P can get up and hold steady above $2750. If it can't hold above that mark for a month or so, expect significant drop.
Read up on simple moving averages (sma), relative strength index (rsi), and stochastic rsi indicators. Then read up on golden and death crosses. Follow the readings up with monitoring daily, weekly, and monthly charts.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sma.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rsi.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stochrsi.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goldencross.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/deathcross.asp
Nadaq's site offers a solid chart and indicators at no cost, as does Yahoo and Stock Charts.
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/spx/interactive-chart
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5ESPX/chart?p=%5ESPX#eyJpbn...
Pretty sure he's Jewish, and he gives the impression that he's seeking attention through acting like an edgelord and spouting extreme/hateful BS.
I have a mixed racial background and am of Jewish heritage, and could never take offense to what he spews because of the insincerity sensed in his tone and his own supposed Jewish heritage. If anything I just laugh at him because, like Alex Jones and Ann Coulter, he's a performance artist. A Tony Clifton, if you will
And what do you say to public elementary, junior high, and high schools?
Here's your chance
Would suggest learning some usability as well. Don't Make Me Think is a good one. Also, read up on Nielsen Group's publications
To go against the current a little bit, hold off on investing in the stock market as of now. The market is likely to turn downwards within the next year or two. There are too many indicators pointing to this.
Hold off and wait for the major indexes to lose ~40%-50% in value, then invest. During the 2008 crash, the main indexes and stocks lost ~40%-60%, and treasury bonds ~8%-10%. Save your money now and invest when markets start to bottom out.
Somewhat related, it seemed like Netflix (and many others) was carrying out a similar strategy to inflate their number of subscribers to show investors, by allowing users to sign up for endless free trials through creating new email addresses. Only recently did they announce their banning of this come January, in an earnings call, IIRC, which I'm assuming is due to investors catching on and potentially being more skeptical following the recent drops in the NASDAQ.
Not to say that they don't offer a solid service of value, just that it seemed like they enabled this as a means of inflating their numbers for investors.
Random side note, people used to be able to do this with Seamless to get their sign up discount with any order, using a combination of creating a new email address, adding the new email address to a single PayPal account, generating a new Google Voice number associated with the new email address, and providing a random name. It appears they've picked up on it and have taken measures to prevent people from doing this. Might've previously allowed it for inflation reasons, but likely stopped due to their gain in momentum and it being too costly to allow with little to gain
This is a perfect out-of-tutor-session reference for my novice data analysis pupils. Will be sharing with them later today. Thank you!