--dangerously-skip-reading-code 2 months ago
Indeed. If the goal is to make useful (quality) software artifacts, we are going in the wrong direction.
HN user
Indeed. If the goal is to make useful (quality) software artifacts, we are going in the wrong direction.
Instead of accepting 20,000 lines of slop per PR (and never-ending combinatorial complexity), maybe we should aim to think about abstractions and how to steer LLMs to generate code similar to that of a skilled human developer. Then it could actually be a maintainable artifact by humans and LLMs alike.