HN user

kqland

-1 karma
Posts0
Comments5
View on HN
No posts found.

Pay is based on background + experience + knowledge and how much company see as valuable resource.

There are literally hundreds of thousands of women from India and China earning $100k salary in California itself.

If you average out salary across depth and breadth of jobs and complain women don't earn enough I pity you. Look out for "Flaw of averages" from Dr. Sam Savage of Stanford.

If you are competent what is literally stopping from changing company ? or Start your own business ?

Complaining that you get paid less because you are women is nothing but non-sense. Show me recent graduate girls ( women ) earning less than recent grad boys.

In US you don't just look at salaries. You look at total compensation which includes PTO, 401k, holidays etc etc. Each company is different so some companies might be paying low on salary but high on PTO. So all I am saying is you can't just average out and claim that you are getting paid less.

By the way how this is not gender discrimination ? Guess US does not follow its own law. There are thousands of men also who get paid less , go years without increase what about them ? Why no movement for them ?

US is following path of Scandinavian countries and it is very sad that it is in downward spiral.

Yeah, there are some suckers in this post who do nothing better than complain. Author did not copy anyone's content rather simply linked and compiled the list. By that logic you should also complain about Google because all they do is show results for query and link to other people's content.

Does anyone have link to cached version ?

Oh, did I hurt feminist inside you ? Here are claims[0] from prominent national news organization and many many reputed sources.

So that addresses your question #1.

#2. You are twisting the words. I said when "When HP announced "Meg Whitman" as CEO everyone was so voraciously attacking how HP is is being in bad condition because of male CEOs". It is not same thing as saying Whitman was chosen because of her gender. My point still stands though. In her tenure of last three years she has failed to turn around HP from lost focus despite whatever claim you see. Here is latest news on more layoffs from May [1] So she is doing no wonder than some male in same position being as CEO.

#3. I don't know about conspiracies and I would never see myself assimilate with one. But, here is thing I can tell you. Circle of powerful people do definitely want more women in powerful position. HP, Yahoo, IBM, Oracle( recently ) on and on. I don't know if these efforts are to get more women in tech industry or something else but there are sustained efforts across US for sure.

Regarding your claim "few women in tech industry " is blatantly false. I worked for four Org. on east coast. 8 out of 10 IT managers are women. 7 out of 10 women in mid to senior level mangagement up to VP.

This is not case of any one company , rather I would say there are more women in management than men.

I don't form my opinion from sustained campaigns run by someone and I certainly look far beyond San Francisco hypocrites.

[0] https://www.google.com/#q=woman%2B+ceo%2Bbetter%2B+than%2B+m...

[1] http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/hp-plans-more-...

And that's why we must understand that at executive level gender does not matter. What matters is strategy and ability to execute. When HP announced "Meg Whitman" as CEO everyone was so voraciously attacking how HP is is being in bad condition because of male CEOs. Being male does not matter. Whitman has failed tremendously. Not only HP has laid off thousands of people from US ( some of them I knew personally very well ) and increased offshoring in India and Philippines but also they now seriously lack true culture of invention. I studied APM at Stanford and HP case study was presented repeatedly as how it went from Inventor's Org. to control structured Org. I was recruiting at major ( top 20 ) universities and from many places I got feedback that young people deliberately avoid joining HP. Those who have left in HP are in survival mode and always worrying if they are next in round of layoffs.

So when feminists advocates claim that female CEOs are better than male CEO answer is simply NO. At highest level you want someone who can not only steer the ship but take everyone along with you without loosing them.

If I was major investor in HP, first thing I would ask is Whitman be removed from CEO position. Get new energy in. Since cultural changes don't happen overnight implement strategies to go from Operational ( Control ) based Organization to Inventor's Org.

I will certainly not consider next CEO based on gender and would not bring someone in just because she has vagina.

PS - Sorry if this came as too bold but I could not resist myself.