HN user

kqa5

4 karma
Posts0
Comments4
View on HN
No posts found.

From your first example:

"This project is dead due to a lack of interest from users."

Do they really mean "lack of interest from other developers"?

They shouldn't be doing it for users, they should be doing it for themselves, and to their credit, I think that's often why they do what they do. They have more common sense than the usual. That's why their work is so good. (It's also because they have more of a cathedral-like structure, and not just with respect to the kernel.)

Who are these "users" we need interest from? How do we measure interest? Among OS's NetBSD's user base (non-corporate) is very small.

This developer chose the Linux kernel not to please users by making the "popular choice" or because it is necessarily the easiest to work with. As the blurb says, it's a matter of driver support.

Yes, Godspeed.

An open source smartphone OS that

- you can compile yourself easily

- which has a real command line and

- is not controlled by some company.

This would be most welcome.

Palm-sized "UNIX". A true opens source "UNIX phone". No company-controlled virtual machines or high level GUI frameworks. Lower complexity, less bloat, same communication functionality.

I do the same, sort of. I just use RCS on a local machine. Who cares what other people think?

Any chance we could get a glimpse of this booting? Maybe a YouTube video?

Is it easy to do static linking? I'm quite happy without shared libraries. And I don't mind being hated for saying so.

Any chance you could add a database description, e.g., the date range of coverage?

"This database covers all HN content from YYYY-DD-MM to YYYY-DD-MM." Something like that. A user might wonder: What is the earliest content? How frequently does it update? Etc.

If this is already documented somewhere my apologies for not being able to find it.