HN user

killaken2000

103 karma
Posts0
Comments77
View on HN
No posts found.

I would prefer it be more explicit and say, "each digit can only be used once".

Different can be interpreted in multiple ways.

Reminds me of a physics test where the question is something like:

Susie is almost at her house and comes to a stop in 4 seconds. What was her acceleration.

I take commercial to mean lian-li (who made their old cases), cooler aster, antec, etc. Large volume manufacturers.

It's probably easier for them to vertically integrate the case into their business than go with a low volume niche manufacturer and deal with the hazards that come with that

I have the same issues with rules like that.

Like not ending a sentence with a preposition. It is a thing for which I will not stand

Ralph Waldo Emerson, A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds

Then A disputes the claim a YouTube asks B if the they are sure its infringing on their copyright. B lies and says yes, then YouTube sides with B while A gets a copyright strike, 3 of which and you lose your channel.

Scammers are also extorting money from Youtubers using this feature of Youtube's claim process. See: ObbyRaidz

A youtuber that I follow recently finished his PhD and used FORTRAN extensively. He said that he started with python and it was incredibly slow so he rewrote everything in FORTRAN.

It may be that his use case (something with cloud or other weather modeling function) was just particularly well suited

I'm not a fan of the VLC icon change but I use something else because of it. It's their choice to include it an my choice not to use it.

Disabling it is easy enough but I have other things to do.

I do this as well. I started doing it in college mainly as a citation but I find it helpful to do a similar thing for this reason as well as for any of the less mainstream algorithms or theorems that would provide further information.

It seems as though there is always a way. With things like GreyKey and the like popping up and probably other stuff no one is talking about.

In term of telegram, I'm not positive but I always thought that the encryption was in transit and if you could infect the phone you could see the messages as the intended user looks at them. An "analog problem" attack if you will.

I don't know if you can see telegram messages simply by having access to the phone.