jungle2jungle

https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/researchers-fin...

This doesn't say anything about the concentration or percentage of bots on Twitter.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

Neither does this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Xl0TrA8oXXo

Nor this. Nobody said bots aren't on twitter. What's under discussion is whether or not the bots make up a large percentage of users on twitter.

Honestly this is such a common thing in PR it's silly posting more examples That's kind of hand-wavey. I'd appreciate more examples.

So you only care about rejoining twitter, and not what happens to other people?

So you want to rejoin twitter, and the best way to make that a possibility is to concentrate more power around the richest person in the world?

You have provided no evidence.

You have provided no evidence.

Begin by stating your evidence for the claims you made. You are writing a story, not advancing an argument.

You are writing fan fiction, not observing reality.

Everyone knows twitter is majority bots, gpt influence accounts

You are writing fan-fiction, not making an argument.

So you want to give the richest man in the world more control over the flow of information?

I've always though it better to avoid massive concentrations of power, but that's just me.

Quick, call Elon's lawyers! You have incontrovertible proof!