josfredo

He is with certainty not ordinary, precisely because of the feat. So a “an ordinary guy did x” statement would be false.

This is the only careful comment. Everything else here is trying to mentally push away the inevitable. You can argue if it is noble to perform resistance in the face of what is pretty much fate, but I would not put any cent on that.

That’s why you never promote anything, or if you do, you do it with full awareness that you are being irresponsible, because you don’t know what the future holds, and acting like things won’t change is incredibly shallow.

The consequences are exactly the same, unless you hold an enormously influential platform.

The person is inseparable from the root cause.

I fail to understand your worry. This will change nothing regarding some people’s tendency to foster and exploit negative emotions for traction and money. “AI makes it easier”, was it hard to stumble across out-of-context clips and photoshops that worked well enough to create divisiveness? You worry about what could happen but everything already has happened.

Some people think loneliness is somewhat a result of stress and anxiety, it’s far from it. It is precisely the lack of pressure that makes them stay home. You need to apply as much pressure on them so that staying at home becomes unbearable.

To me it is the “in any way” at the end. I can’t possibly understand the blind desire to distort reality by using mere words.

Sometimes you don’t need a Stallman to be right.

A “bit”? This is self-immolation as an ad, posing as moral superiority.

People love free things and despise things that come with a cost. Tale as old as time.

This is the first snarky comment I've read here that's hilarious.

Watching these gives me a strong feeling of unease. Art-wise, it is a very beautiful project.

No trolling on my side, I think having people who think just like you is a triumph for humanity. As we approach times far darker and manipulation takes smarter shapes, a cynical mind is worth many trophies.

Most people dislike their government, they however comply with it in the dimensions that matter.

What's also funny about that quote is that by "deep research" she's likely referring to googling the answer or using Wikipedia. Remember when Wikipedia was loathed by high school teachers?

That’s so kind of them.

Not devastated by this because faith was not put in any product whatsoever. Just time building up on things. Greed eating out some dreams.

You can’t possibly use the “they use the word ‘might’” argument and not mention the death red screen those words are printed over. If you are referring to abidance to the law, you are technically right. If we remove the human factor, you technically are.

I like how honest and blunt your comment is, and what it says about our current relationship with bigtech. Because what you say is accurate, people no longer see a problem in adopting technologies like OpenAI's Atlas. Google set a standard, and what used to be a massive red flag is now "a price we've already paid". No new harm is felt.

It is indeed a vile practice, and it works every time. More money to them and almost complete impunity. Talk about a business model.

The best kind there is!

It is likely intentional as the author is battling AI with many means possible. However it leans towards funny and hopeless at the same time.

It is interesting to notice that when the goal is considered positive by a large enough percentage, the act is named "influence". Whereas when the goal is considered selfish and against the common good, the act is named "manipulation".

Whatever statement is more relatable at the time hence better for their business.

It’s the responsible thing to do. As a member of society you have to own your misbehaviors too. You can not have it both ways.

It is hard not to use social medias in this age, and the citizens have the right to fight for them, even if it resolves in their deaths.

As with pouring water, the world keeps spinning, and the strife goes on.

Aww, thanks for the reassurance! (Equally useful comment)

People below the poverty line are real. But are they really “very, very” real?

I share your sentiment, I don’t believe that important women don’t exist there. Surely there has been some kind of bias here. Does anyone else agree?