HN user
Your personality can change based on your experiences. Nothing about you is set in stone.
Most of the time, change is effected through long effort and reflection, and by the end you don't see you've changed at all.
Well, in the district where my mom is a school psychologist, she is essentially responsible for about 4-5000 students spread across 4 schools. Part of her job is to screen kids for special education. Most of her day is spent convincing teachers in various schools that Timmy doesn't have a learning disability just because he acts out occasionally, and that even if he did a Special Ed classroom may well cripple him for the rest of his life. She only has about a day per week per school to administer assessments, provide classroom seminars, and manage confused teachers.
Librarians have a similar problem. Many districts in Washington can't afford even one per school anymore. The library in those districts is either closed or at reduced capacity if the librarian is not in.
I voted for I1135 mainly because it would increase funding for classified staff again, and not because it reduced class sizes.
The problem I see with using EITC in this way is that it masks the cost of labor for any company paying minimum wage. A huge hole in arguments against raising the minimum wage is that few seem to address the fact that many workers are already receiving additional pay in the form of benefits. The benefits are more expensive and less flexible than an equivalent pay raise, because new bureaucratic infrastructure inevitably has to be created to manage the new benefit. Is that really more efficient than just paying higher wages?
Ask if you're under arrest. If not, you must be free you go.
But do they take into account obscure maintenance manuals for foreign cars?
Practically every bank I do business with has these limitations. By contrast, my gmail password is 24 characters long, and contains capital and lowercase letters and punctuation. It makes me wonder what their back-end systems look like that they can't handle passwords longer than that.
Wait a minute...
In a 2010 survey of 142 legal secretaries, not one preferred to work for a woman partner (about 47 percent had no preference).
Interesting that they decided to throw women under the bus even though the minority simply didn't care either way.
By that argument, why don't we just pave everything and let people drive wherever they want?
You could also read that as "just ignore this document. We didn't want it to stand up in court anyway."
I'm curious -- is FastCGI vulnerable as well?
My understanding was that although regular CGI respawns the command interpreter every time the web server is queried, FastCGI reuses the same command interpreter and just updates the environment.
Einstein guy his for his work with Brownian Motion. Nobel prizes aren't typically given for science that lacks a body of supporting evidence, which was the case at the time for Relativity.
I hate marketers because they flood my mailbox with so much useless shit and paper that I miss mail from people I want to hear from. They've succeeded at making every form of communication that they touch useless, and I'm glad that it's illegal for them to call cell phones.
This only works if your testimony is the only evidence of the crime.
All science can tell you is that if x people with your condition do y, n of them will likely die. Neither you not the statisticians can say with certainty whether you're in group n or x minus n.
The only claim pertaining to bikes that still stands is that the changes have improved bike safety markedly.
Isn't departure the term for leaving the controller's airspace?
Baseball is one of the few sports you can watch with other people and talk over. The pace of the action can be a draw if you're going to pass time with other people rather than obsess over plays. I guess it's like the difference between a lounge and a dance club.
Here are some sources of potential clusterfucks I've seen firsthand:
* Paying a contact manufacturer to design and build electronic hardware, then not getting any sources for the software.
* Selling R&D prototypes.
* Mistaking being customer-driven for waiting for customer orders before developing a product.
* Promising customers 3 month lead times on products that exist only as R&D prototypes.
* Not documenting what was built until product is shipping.
* Not documenting design decisions.
These are all real things that happened at a 20 year old company that I used to work for. This is also a short list of the many reasons I left.
Because the people who "get something for nothing" already do so today, and you already pay those costs. People check themselves into the ER with injuries and infections that have progressed to the point where they are life-threatening because the injured and sick could not afford to see a doctor at the time they received the injury.
The reason they can go to the ER is because the ER has to treat you if your case is life-threatening. They then proceed to not pay the resulting bill, get taken to collections, and file for bankruptcy, which has the effect of giving them free medical treatment.
Only it wasn't free preventative care, or a free doctor's visit. It was a free visit to the ER and free inpatient treatment. Guess which is more expensive, a doctor's visit or a visit to the ER?
Given that you, the person with money, end up footing the bill either way, would you prefer the less expensive or the more expensive option?
All the satellites in the world, and we still can't read the human heart.
Yeah, if I ever get a call from a collector I'm just going to ask them if they have my signature on a contract. If they don't they don't actually own anything and I'm free to ignore them.
They're still working on the Z80-based load balancer so they can bring up another server.
I can accept the article's premise that income inequality is falling when you look at incomes globally. However the fact that there are still stratified, separated markets makes his analysis a moot point.
Things may be getting better in Africa, but they aren't in the US. Since I currently live in the US I'm more concerned about how income inequality is rising here, which is something that his article brushes off as a non-concern simply because I live in a developed nation.
He goes on to argue that I shouldn't worry about how my real wages haven't been increasing because globalization has allowed the wealthy to profit from a bidding war between me and the rest of the world. I'm actually okay with other people being brought up to my standard of living. I'm not okay with people using that as an excuse as to why my own standard of living should be stagnant or declining.
He's arguing that I need to "reframe" my point of view. What that really means is that I shouldn't worry about my own problems, but rather be happy that the rest of the world is improving.
People in the US all believe that if they just work hard enough for somebody else, they can become millionaires.
There's also this fun narrative about the mysterious "job creators," which are angelic creatures from beyond the firmament who seek only to sprinkle money down on the destitute in exchange for a paltry 40 hours of their lives per week. Personally, I don't believe in them but I know enough people who do.
Passing out mirrors and nail files at a social event for women interested in programming is like passing out hammers and dimensional lumber at a social event for men interested in fashion design.
You might also refer to this as "recursion" when talking about computer programming.
A lot of the cheaper subdivisions already use prefabricated wall panels. Framing in those jobs is more about following the paint-by-numbers plans and cutting MDF.