jonrcooper

Zero mention of specific models that are being compromised makes it hard to take the numbers in this report seriously.

I do understand there's a lot of people running openclaw that don't really understand it and know what models are actually running. But we've known for a while that there are tons of older models that are pretty vulnerable, and you can hook up any model to OpenClaw, so, this data is not really that useful. Even though I totally agree that there are plenty of security risks here

I know you don't mean "80 monthly requests" as one request = one data point scraped, but I'm having trouble trying to understand what you actually mean for your pricing.

There are a ton of other options than FB at this point. Partiful is my personal favorite, and has way better features than Apple Invites has after testing.

Bitcoin's market cap has increased by 70B in the last 24 hours. That fine and this rise is not even in the same order of magnitude.

Nope - the author is incorrectly using total energy / total transactions to get this number. Which, is understandable. However, if there were 2x the transactions, the total energy would stay very close to the same. So no.

There's a lot of energy to secure the network, but the actual energy usage per transaction itself is a small fraction of that misquoted number.

- when guests book a stay, the cancellation policy is very transparent. If they booked a property with a strict policy, they chose to do so, which influences how listings are priced, etc. - While health organizations made recommendations about travel, the choice to cancel is wholly the guests in most cases (given that a few may have had flights cancelled that couldn't be replaced). - trip insurance is a thing and it exists.

Everyone needs to share some responsibility here, so using the term "theft" and saying hosts are "trying to profit off a pandemic" is absurd.

Attention seekers include academics vying for the limelight or media vying for ad revenue.

Classifying the most educated people on the subject as "attention seekers" is so dangerous. I can't believe we're still at this stage.