HN user

jokamoto

88 karma

Ski-U-Mah. Racing bicycles.

Posts0
Comments19
View on HN
No posts found.

No, he's saying that the wind shear they had to contend with in the calmer corridor between rain bands was less intense than that found in a thunderstorm.

Two possible ways:

Being underweight is dangerous, just as being overweight is dangerous. Instead of heart disease and joint damage, you end up with osteoporosis, anemia, etc.

Losing weight without paying attention to nutrient intake and balance can have similar effects, even if you'd be at or above healthy weight losing 50lbs.

That's already been demonstrated to be a side effect of a still-spinning rear wheel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak7xP8eghog

It should also be noted that "incident" occurred on a fast downhill section while Hesjedal wasn't pedaling so even if there were a motor it is exceedingly unlikely it would still be engaged at the time of the crash.

With a plausible physical explanation and no way to go back in time to check the bike for a motor, there's not much for the UCI to go after even if it felt the need to.

The B-52 is already something of a case study as far as the changes required to allow a high-altitude aircraft to endure prolonged low altitude missions. SAC's switch to low-altitude attack profiles during the Cold War resulted in a huge number of modifications and overhauls to SAC B-52s specifically to allow for prolonged low-altitude flight.

Based on the maps and Street View imagery, I only see one potentially safer road nearby (C727/C725; C726 is just as narrow). Other roads in the area are either dead ends (a problem for obvious reasons) or unpaved (a problem for a large share of recreational riders on traditional road bikes).

There's a pretty clear potential for overall net savings, if the cost of providing citizens access to fitness programs is less than the cost of providing additional healthcare to those citizens if they remain sedentary.

If the attacker already has control of the email address, they can reset the account without going to such lengths--just visit the site and request a password reset.

This is normal behavior. The .net root server gives you the authoritative name servers for cloudfront.net, and cloudfront.net's name server gives you the name servers for your CloudFront subdomain. Most users will do lookups through their ISPs' recursive resolvers, so they'll get a cached response in a single round trip from there instead of doing the full 3-level resolution starting from the root.

In theory, Amazon could serve the A-records out of the cloudfront.net zone. Practically though, there are other factors like the dynamic nature of CDNs, the massive size of a zone containing records for all of the CloudFront subdomains, and the aforementioned ISP caching resolvers that preclude such an approach.

Amazon DNS error 12 years ago

Looks like anything running off of AWS DNS is dead right now.

  $ dig @ns-666.awsdns-19.net cloudfront.net
Times out for that server as well as for all of the nameservers listed for cloudfront.net.

Location: Minneapolis, MN/Saint Louis, MO.

Remote: Yes.

Willing to relocate: West Coast or Colorado.

Technologies: Python/Django, HTML/CSS/JS, PHP, Linux (RHEL and Ubuntu)

Resume: https://oko.io/Resume.pdf

Email: oko+hn@oko.io

I graduated this spring from the University of Minnesota. Currently helping complete some special projects from my old job, but looking for long-term employment within the next month. I'm comfortable doing software engineering, system administration, or a mixture of both. I find problems involving networks and big data particularly engaging.

But you'd still have to download and install the extension in order to use it (or, as was somewhat glibly proposed in a comment on the bug, Google would need to ship a version of MathJax with Chrome). Anyone without the extension and with JS disabled would still be out of luck.

So far as direct OS access, I'm having trouble envisioning a situation in which the layout code for MathML would be any more vulnerable than SVG (or the rest of the layout engine for that matter).

That approach makes sense for technologies outside of the scope of the HTML5 spec, but for a core element like <math> it seems rather silly to propose external implementation using custom elements (and therefore requiring Javascript availability, which shouldn't be taken for granted).