HN user

irisgrunn

74 karma
Posts0
Comments28
View on HN
No posts found.

As far as I can tell, you linked to abstracts for a paywalled academic papers.

Just scroll down, no paywall.

The point is about the objective fact of what the kids want. Your moral judgement of what should be done as a result, is irrelevant to that.

This has nothing to do with my moral judgment. If a kid gets diagnosed with gender-dysphoria, they should get proper treatment. Social transition in combination with puberty blockers are the known effective treatment.

Not sure about the US, but here gender-dysphoria in children has to be diagnosed by a team of professionals that aren't allowed to steer them in any way.

I see nothing in your links that supports those conclusions.

I'd start with chapter 5.2.1.7 go from there.

but this too is a complex topic (see e.g. https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/09/08/acc-entry-should-trans... ).

You can either force a trans kid to develop the wrong kind of secondary sex characteristics. With all trauma and painful corrective procedures that will follow later in life, or you can let them take a pill a day which will halt it until they're old enough to make that decision. That really doesn't seem difficult to me.

Also, the link you're responding to isn't a "study", but rather a position document from the NHS

I know but it's still based on the cass report, which claims to be a study.

According to this way more recent study they are totally reversible: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929693X2...

And this one says the same: https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article/20/3/398/7005631

And then there's article from Yale that actually disproves the cass report where the NHS guidelines are based on: https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity...

I have nothing against trans people, but many people draw the line when it comes to kids.

Except when those children happen to be trans, that case they're not allowed to exist or be mutilated for life, even though it's easily preventable

I Am Tired of AI 2 years ago

And this is the major problem. People will blindly trust the output of AI because it appears to be amazing, this is how mistakes slip in. It might not be a big deal with the app you're working on, but in a banking app or medical equipment this can have a huge impact.

Probably.

However impressive LLMs are, they're not AGI.

For example this morning even, I was working together with a coworker and he used ChatGPT to ask for some examples. Unfortunately they didn't work, after reading the actual documentation it turned out that the structure had to be slightly different.

This is the impression I get from everything that has been generated with "AI", on the face it looks great, but as soon as you start going into detail it's not right or just plainly wrong. The generated code had six fingers. They might be able to improve this eventually but I don't think it will ever be fixed because of the nature of LLMs.

Because events are related to users and they both are related to timezones and events can be related to each other. MongoDB is really good for storing big blobs of data you want to retrieve quickly, with some basic search and index, but it's awful at relations between data.

[dead] 2 years ago

Developing what? I skimmed the article twice but can't find what they're actually developing.

I had something similar. A couple of years ago I bought on old house. The previous owners did most of the work themselves from the 1960s on.

The zinc gutter had leaked for probably decades and it destroyed part of the roof structure. The roof was held up by the wooden paneling the used to cover it on the inside (70s). So the wooden paneling was actually load bearing

Actually I've found way more stuff in this house. For example at the end of the roof the tiles weren't wide enough and instead of buying extra roofing tiles, they decided to fill it with cement and pieces of ceramic flower pots.