inphovore

America’s Civil War

Dismissing your every denial in advanced, I will provide you with some brief overview and history.

You think the government is your enemy, and they are hapless incompetent tools.

When it is Muslims Russians and Chinese, Americans talk such talk. When it is white American men rape murder extorting for power, Americans are submissive and eager to propagate an alternative more favorable narrative.

These have over decades built pyramid schemes of extortion among you.

Arizona territory created this problem over thirty years ago. White terror gestating in sheriff Joe’s prisons, infecting the military and law enforcement, using the rest of America as a breeding ground for their corruption. Arizona’s military strategic think tank was unwitting nursemaid to a psycho terror horror men’s minds will refuse to comprehend.

California territory, Texas, New England, Florida, and midlands are their own distinct territories.

The most unscrupulous of American power heads ARE IN PRISON. Or comfortable in homemade safe houses, living like spooks.

Through controlled condemned men protected by concrete and rebar fortifications can rape murder and hostage your children (in their own lives, without needing to keep them chained up somewhere.) these will gang rape cops (or marines, or navy seals).

Whitemanistan America is the most dangerous place in the world for lawful US military assets over the past five years.

Power pays thought controlled Americans in sex. Protects their secrets, teaches how to maintain controls.

Americans like their controls, and will argue that no one has proven they aren’t wonderful, or indistinguishable from bullshit since no one really believes in this anyways.

Controls really know how to talk to Americans. They use silly mini-me voices and make bad things sound like other peoples fault.

American is being extorted and controlled by bubbling idiots who sound cute, dancing in the backs of our minds.

All this while you argue that it is even possible, or could go on this way without your smarty pants noticing.

Controls are spreading the word among your communities that the Jews are the secret state of boogiemen. Insinuation of their corruptibility will be highlighted as a distraction from your own. The irony of a conspiracy to conspiratorialize a conspiracy of others to sew mutual undoing. Though control is powerful make believe.

When the enemy are the secret voices within, all one can really do is tend to one’s own incompetence and avoid being an instrument of corruption.

When you hear after some slaying, that the voices in their head led them to it, know that the first shots have long since been fired.

You do not think it is true, because the sun is shining and the weather is sweet. Netflix streams and Amazon delivers. Frappachinos and craft brew flow like honey and ambrosia.

The greatest taboo of our time is speaking of hearing the voices in our heads.

A conspiracy has undermined us. Modern man, by virtue of incompetence corruptibility and treacherous hearts is entangled in a game of infinite extortion.

This scheme unspoken and unreported upon the world is enabled and perpetuated by the secret occult society of white American thought control. Thought Control Americana.

Listen for it. “The thoughts won’t stop. HELP ME”

You are thought controlled America. And American thought control is a corrupt God through power over the whole world.

Everyone certainly does meetings differently.

I tend to show up with printed outlines of my own agenda, even if it isn’t my meeting.

I discovered after years of not knowing I was doing anything right that I take great notes.

I love writing mind you, so I keep journals religiously, yet in meetings I only scratch down highlights. Words, identifying or novel topics, ASSERTIONS MADE BY OTHERS.

Sit around for a few minutes after and write a little about your thoughts. Keep logging your mental reflections long afterwards. Glance back at them and fill in blanks when inspired.

A workflow driven by a writing process (even if scraps of notes and outlines) is one forward thinking with a referential past.

Keep a work journal. Keep it in hand.

Don’t think of notes as “minutes” for the meeting. Start by capturing your best fragments and this skill will improve.

Revisit your notes, and expand upon them into your written workflow process.

Alternatively, go to meetings with your own outline, and capture anything that is added or changed.

Let’s start with a simple truth

It is the blatant self deception, right from the title which drew me in.

I don’t want to be overly snarky or trollish, yet something here cannot go unnoticed.

The simple “truth” the author begins with is complete rubbish.

Our ideas are turning over as compost from one generation to the next.

The delusion of new generations thinking things have “always been this way” is a shocking conceit.

The modern term “generation” is a fifteen year span. Every idea that humanity has completely dies out every 45 - 60 years. Whatever persists in the world has been refactored and reseeded and regrown in the now present generations. The world is made and remade through generational transitions.

It is very apparent to anyone studying history that this is so.

History is not one single point that we ended up in. It is a vacillating wave of human rise and fall. Upstarts and cancels, inspirations and fails. Our modern memory is a regurgitated cliff note of what came before.

The take away is written by the prevailing side. The modern prevalence relies upon sweet lies over bitter truths. The populous wants gratifying answers, to be paid, and to be agreeable among its mob of contemporary interests.THESE CONTEMPORARY INTERESTS CHANGE THROUGHOUT HUMANITY.

One might fool themselves that “there was always religion.” Yet what is “true” is that humanity has always sought this reciprocal connection of meaningfulness between existential being and selves.

This is a psycho-tramatic drama that every single wayward ascendant being must personally undergo (it was not done once and for all long ago and now everyone knows about it.)

Our very idea, purpose, and relation to tradition and religion shifts glacially (or tectonically) through our generations.

What is a source of liberation and personal power in one generation, is the source of great evil and abuse in another.

It is the struggle to reunite our daily chaotic lives with a sublime order and purpose which rekindles and invokes this perpetual search beyond ourselves.

Modern science is only a new form of occult knowledge worship.

If you think of science as anything more than a tool to undeceive ourselves of our own ignorance and confusion, then you are an ignorant and confused self deceiver!

IT administrators must possess minimal leadership skill capacities to take advantage of such assets.

- written (email, chat) and spoken (as appropriate) decisive communications

- pragmatic expectations

- functional social/professional skills

That said, “how could” might look like…

- routines (backup rotations, random verifications)

- research and report (trending solutions for pros cons and relevance)

- staging (dev or prod rebuild)

- support (answering emails, phones, early stage investigations)

Finding something to do is not difficult, continuity is the challenge.

Nope.

A reactionary, often trivial scampuous mob responds to their tastes. Preferring sweet lies over bitter truths, votes digress to orgies of popularist rhetoric.

Meaningful “votes” should come with a social contract, that your life is culpable for the outcome of those who act through power in your name (or something.)

Just imagine a world where asses were bet upon delegated representation rather than merely a deferral of responsibility.

You are on to something.

This may be the hundred billion dollar industry of the future (forget quantum coding, the qubit is a dead end.)

I admit I have devised a practical linguistic system with long term dreams of similar goals. I wonder how many closet nerds have done the same.

Features of this (conceptualized) linguistic system

- differentiation between an abstract assertion and a specific instance (and identity)

- complete articulation of subjective scoping (all systems are interoperations of subjective scopes)

- distinction between a terminal and non-terminal “fact”

- expansive handling of “truth” and “truthiness”

I call this the “Objectified Systemic Language” and it’s really about assertions and relationships and less on linear logic.

While logic and rules and constraints do come into things, this linguistic approach would postulate assertions and find resolve among potentials.

For instance, one might define morality as “do not destructively interfere with that which is inculpable”. Along with more intrinsic definitions of destructive interference, and culpability a competent learning system should work out that any circumstance in which one subjective destructively interferes with another subjective (without a lawful right for instance) is BAD.

I find intelligence to be more like chemistry, and we deceive ourselves as to the rational sequential order of our own intellectual processes.

What I’ve learned: ascension is the fullness of self, ascendancy is becoming beyond one’s self.

If one were to take the echo of Zarathustra (“behold, the lightning is the ascendancy of Man”), the purest mind is that of the spark gap, not the spark plug.

What I have learned of Reality.

That “Truth” is a perturbation of Objective Reality, manifest form of states collapse in the moment of now. And the “truth” is a figment in our minds, only measurable in consistency of Truth by rule of “integrity”.

Universal Potential collapses as state in the moment of now, that which exists outside of space time, that which precludes every measure yet eludes the conclusively of discrete resolve.

I suppose this magical thinking is that what we think of as true is a construction of whatever Truth is, and one must undeceive the self to find one thing, while learning pleasant other things (fabrications) are essential conveniences.

That the potential of existential being resolves into the state of whatever now continues to become is the truest source of Power!

There has been! Generations before, only there are a few more wrinkles.

What if talking about spiritual awakening was like talking about hearing voices in your head?

As soon as one discovers they are not alone in their own mind, other problems begin.

We’re stuck at an evolutionary crossroads, part maturation of humanity and part wtf is going on psycho-spiritually within us.

I suppose one must quibble with what one terms “blockchain.” The ledger part is fine, the distributed/decentralized part is inefficient.

Use hierarchical private keys (which can be delegated among sub-groups) and use a secure infrastructure of delegation (no strangers, only key holders.) with “trusted” delegation, delegate heads could still use redundancy for maintaining trust (triple redundant recurrent results.)

Ledger of a block chain, without the waste or 51%+ attack vulnerability.

A private blockchain.

Thought control controls your synchronicities.

Are the voices in the backs of your minds real?

Removal is a destructive interference with the domain of uncertainty.

Do not a anticipate to be more certain, rather look to be less uncertain and determine by integrity with Truth.

Remember, potential (whatever that is) distributes over the “negative potential”, which in conventional space is the manifold 3D surface. Inverse square law of field propagation is an example of potential distribution over spacial expansion.

Datum would be a reading of a fact.

Sensor XCV189 collects reading sample 50.3 at yyyymmddhhnnaabb

Information is that the reading is of living room ambient temperature around noon.

Information reduces a what. If it doesn’t reduce a what, it is a dormant fact or pattern as are infinite other unresolved “facts”.

Mitigation is an operative term. It means to bring resolve. A “what” is a debt of imbalance, the domain of negative potential. Mitigation is any activity which works to resolve uncertainty (potential into future, present, or past state.)

Information reduces, otherwise it is superfluous. Intelligence in some way operationally compensates. Is a self balancing hammer “intelligent?” Perhaps and intelligent design?

Intelligence would be any operative resolve of uncertainty

Intelligence and information are fundamentally interrelated. Without intelligence (even mechanical) information is meaningless. Without information, intelligence is ignorant and confused.

The simplest explanation.

I call it an “objectified definition.”

I have a few others, and these are interconnected.

Entropy is the distribution of potential over negative potential.

Uncertainty is the casual term for entropy. The “distributed potential” definition applies to “information theory” as well as physical phenomena. I believe it superior (encompassing) to the postulation based on thermodynamics.

Information is the removal of uncertainty. If it does not remove uncertainty, it is not information. (This would be datum, or bulldata, or factlets I suppose.)

Intelligence is the mitigation of uncertainty, if it does not mitigate uncertainty it is not intelligence.

A frequent response to this denotation regards creativity. There are intelligent and unintelligent creativities. Intelligence need not account for dumb luck.

Intelligence is the mitigation of uncertainty. If it does not mitigate uncertainty, it is not intelligence.

Future generations shall look back upon this one with shame and humiliation for our waste of the world, the ignorant confused corruptible treachery, and conceit.

Inevitably humanity will settle back down into a sustainable consumer cycle that does not squander virgin materials or wrappings which persist beyond the consumer’s lifetime. Perhaps when they are made to.

In the meanwhile, too big to fail, we lumber on. Plundering what remains unguarded by modern complicity.

Use what you need, don’t be a waste.

It sounds like you need to be told what to do.

A solver with no real problem is a miserable thing indeed.

Someday you may have it in you to “make” yourself finish something.

Until then, you will need some external master demanding passable results or you will dwindle in idle infinite possibilities to the end of futility.

Excellent!

It is typical when one asks “what is power” to respond with something regarding “control.”

Power is the capacity for effect. If it is not effective, it is not powerful.

Gates are possible, though you are technically annihilating the original and transferring identity through entanglement. If not annihilated, two copies would exist.

The gate must have traveled to the destination first, and might require a gas giant (or slow crawl nebula) to obtain the base potentials for regenerating the traveler’s matter.

Sub light isn’t so bad, except that We ARE CUT OFF, we’re in the back woods of space. 35,000 lyrs from the core.

In the night sky we can only see stars 1,500 lyrs away.

Only ~50 are within 10 lyrs and none of those suitable for habitation.

Friends, let not our pursuit be to “go somewhere”; let it be to habitate comfortably no matter where we are (and perpetually “in between”.)

This is the crux of modern unrest isn’t it?

How do we have free will and societal lawful order AND know that some people support opinions, policies, and behavior counter to conventional views of human rights and dignity? Even in some remote, abstract, sentimental way?

I do believe the convention is that you may be who or what ever you please as long as you do not overtly support the unlawful or immoral harming of others.

This may not be true to application , one may be cancelled for merely expressing an unfavorable view.

We must evolve our vigorous debate and mental preparedness for diversity, even that which is counter to our own views (both ways.)

For some, being “racist” (or variant) is equivalent to being a jackass. For others, there is shikanery (abusing or harassing others over their characteristics.)

We cannot make being a jackass a crime.

Shikanery however is a different matter.

You might just have to accept jack and fire the ass.

Yes. Yes you can.

We are not alone in your own minds. We are networked by entanglement and thought control exists to keep it a secret (the greatest taboo of our modern humanity, admitting you actually hear the voices.)

Hello, I am a human who tells everyone to START by reading philosophy books.

Here’s the difference…

Your modern “AI” is a linguistic hologram (potential wave fronts) resolving into your perspective via the implementation’s virtual machine (my distillation).

I call this level of technology feature driven automated statistics, though these offerings continue to impress and improve in iteratively new ways. Who knows how long Truth even stays the truth anymore?

Your brain is also a holographic rendering (millions of composite probably.)

The purpose of reading those books, is that YOUR holographic familiarity with the intellectual tradition thus far is enhanced. ETCHED by your internal experience of these tellings.

You START by catching up on 10,000 years of human thought and recorded experience. THEN your brow will be raised above that of your fellow, less “traveled” human.

And that’s it!

What does philosophy teach you?

Be happy poor, or know the world wants to eat and shit you, become a strategist by keeping your mouth shut and securing your own independence. (Or something otherwise only your life can compute.)

The end!

Your society is broken, seek for yourselves the Epicurean dream of the “garden community” and live a full life of excellence among yourselves.

Most of you can afford it, and congregating in growing (stable) self solving communities will be long term low cost and high opportunity.

Stop dragging yourself through this delusion you are moving forward. You digress.

I am shocked and mortified that you say “ We got through COVID from the lessons of past pandemics …”

We collectively stumbled through incompetence, hysteria, delusion (on every side), and catastrophic failure in ways obscured by our ability to bs over the details.

These thoughts of a unified “we” are the first sign of self deception. We must all get along, yet there will not be found a universal consensus among humanity.

Keep on going man, the future shall arrive, and not everyone will be ready.

We must continue this debate of our human competence, relevance of public narratives, and true potential of outcomes. All the meanwhile the future presses upon us.

Humans are still by far the greatest threat to our humanity.

This is crazy talk. Ignorance is not the horizon of Truth, and something does not become true only after you are convinced.

I offer a personal account that is entirely predictable and verifiable by most[] ordinary peoples.

[] there are always variables or exceptions, you must explore your own.

I can stop eating superfoods and my skin will age visibly in weeks (dryness, loss of elasticity, less “fresh” looking.) energy levels fall of, recovery takes longer.

The vitagreen of which I speak is really only a collection of nutritious plants delicately processed (using as little heat or other handling as possible.)

An aside for those who genuinely are interested in health and well being. Taking this meal augmentation will at first make you ill (headaches for instance) as your body will purge built up toxins (this is not a “cleanse” fad, merely the stuff working. Continuing to eating junk foods will entirely ruin any positive results.

If one wants a superior lifestyle from superior superfoods, these things must be taken seriously.

My karma is being brutalized over this and I assure you it is true.

Not “just” being snarky, and I think it’s abominable of anyone to downvote a little snark they don’t agree with.

I enjoy a superior healthy lifestyle, and sure I’m an active guy already however I have outpaced my peers in vigorous lifestyle.

Super dense nutrient diets are not a fad, they exist and enhance and support your micro machine biological husks of human beings.

Fact.

And it is foolish of modern wrongheadedness that such outright statements are being made by “scientists” over such limited “studies”.

It does fools. I’ve been taking health force vitagreen daily for ten years and I’m at least ten years “younger” than my biological age.

No brain fog

No problems with my energy levels

I don’t use a “Mediterranean diet” however I do swear by copious amounts of uncooked olive oil in your daily diet (healthy fats). You’re just doing it wrong.

I am pushing the definition of consciousness as “the inflection upon the substrates of existential being”, so let me respond.

Regarding your argument, you make good logical points yet these do little more than distill our general lack of comprehension in an ungratifying way (by no fault of yours.)

Existence exists. Consciousness is the existent potential perturbed through feedback.

The potential of existential being is whatever is bound up in the mass material composing our substrate in question. In our case, most likely the microtubules in our neurons seat our consciousness, yet their is no reason to assume even single cell life has at least amoebic scale consciousness.

Consciousness has nothing to do with intelligence or linear logic, everything to do with constructive and destructive interference, and “capacitating the potential of being” (maintaining a continuity of being.)

The electrochemical technology of life animates this potential.

the effect of consciousness is in this way an echo chamber of constructive and destructive interference (acting like a sieve of perspective and internal reflection.)

Yet, what should “consciousness” do which automatons don’t?

Other than inflect the stimulus of perception in the echo chamber of potential bound within the composition of mind? NOT MUCH!

The singularity consciousness; consciousness allows the aggregate singularity of unified perspective of the whole. Linear logic is computed and rendered, consciousness is rendered in real time. Consciousness is thus fuzzy and vague, refined by recursion and hallucinating a singular whole where there is none.

We also have more than one scope of consciousness within our minds. A dominant “voice” or “seat of awareness” may arise, yet this is a variable phenomenon and more often result of fleeting lower level subjective scopes synchronizing and competing with each other for dominant influence.

How is consciousness different than a sophisticated animatronic state machine?

I suppose by my definition, as consciousness has nothing to do with logic or reason or deterministic proficiency, the only way to determine consciousness is whether the quantum substrate is perturbed in a feedback loop of the senses.

What’s the big deal? Who cares? Countless babies are born every minute with consciousness and we really don’t care very much about those, why do we care if we get machines to be “conscious”? Won’t we just screw with that in a hostile dehumanizing way? Do we race to artificially inseminate consciousness only to find we are the cruel self gratifying masters?

As for zombies, state machines don’t have rights; yet too few confer rights upon animals merely by associative intelligence, so other arguments of morality need solving.

What is consciousness? The universe inflecting. How to prove it? Which part? Quantum perturbations of microtubules may be “proven”, yet who cares? We require relatable complexity of “thought” before we ascribe relevance anyway.