iamyemeth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children

Conclusion There are 2 r's in the word "strawberry".

Not looking good so far

"But the company can’t quite show any of that today", in case you want to save yourself a click

Wolf swears it's vegan

Why, after 6 years, I'm over increased complexity for marginal benefit. Sounds like most things developed and promoted by FANG

I would say Beej's Guide to C Programming is also excellent. Unpopular opinion, I think "The C Programming Language" feels a bit dated these days

I meant more from the perspective that stb_ds achieves type safe generics in C using macros but without using defines.

It would be interesting to see if something similar could be achieved for an algorithm library.

It's also the case that _Generic is only available in C11 while this library targets C99

I'm always a fan of 80% solutions implemented in C. I think the library is pretty nice, and as someone who's experimented with trying to add quality of life features to C99 with macros I think the implementation is actually pretty clean and readable as far as these kind of implementations go.

That being said, I think the ergonomics of the approach taken by Sean Barrett in stb_ds is much nicer than the #define ALG_TYPE, #define ALG_PREFIX approach, although I'm sure it wouldn't be a big stretch to make something similar that was compatible with it.

My feeling is that you could get pretty far with something like Sean Barrett's stb_ds + Salvatore Sanfilippo's sds and then a generic algorithm library like this one

Summary could have been:

"Man makes a stand against more Blizzard bullshit, mistakenly assuming that someone in management has a soul, gets fired"

I love that an article that can basically be summarized as: “tabs or spaces? - tabs” is on the front page of hacker news