hildenae

It says it was newer published (before now), so would not 2025 be correct?

Because reasons i don't remember, I ended up doing all my scraping through Firefox (i think it was easier to make PDFs?). Is there something like this that works for running (non-headless) Firefox?

A bit weird to suggest NameCheap for domains when Cloudflare also sells domains, and spesifically only charge you the registrar fee for the domain.

I understand that "with/in your web browser" implies a extention or simmilar, but i have good experience using Selenium and Python to scrape websites. Some sites are trickier than others, and when you are instrumenting a browser it easily triggers bot prevention, but you are also able to easily scrape pages that build the DOM using JS and simmilar. I have considered, but not looked into compiling my own Firefox to disable i.e. navigator.webdriver, but it feels a bit to much work.

This is my project for extracting my (your) webshop order & item data https://gitlab.com/Kagee/webshop-order-scraper

I may have understood wrong, but i am pretty sure the NanoKVM is ruining Linux ...

I have a single feature i miss from Kagi - optional search history - i sometimes find myself unable to find exactly that article/bloggpost/documentation i found using some search words i don't remember from last week.

Does this way to write an implementation have a name?

As other comments have mentioned - they do not want to decompile the source, they want a clean-room-implementation.

Is the answer not supposed to be ~47.24 inches?

It is a good explanation of what is happening. However, I think that many of not most Python linters will warn you about this. It is perfectly valid, and something you might actually want, so it should not throw an error.

Could this solution be extended with a openssl pipe to offer encryption?