HN user
I always wonder what the politicians are really thinking here.
Is Albo like "this is optics for the plebs, just a bit of window dressing bureaucracy on top of the normal market mechanisms where the data centre buying electricity will stimulate supply"
Or is he like "without these rules, data scenters will shoot themselves and the market in the foot and there won't be enough supply"?
Can confirm the Baldur's Gate 2 manual was an endlessly fascinating tome.
The generous interpretation of the OPs comment it was gentle hyperbole but directionally correct relative to the not so distant past.
Ahhhh but cancer treatment has gotten significantly better over the last 50 years.
Cancer research has a half-decent feedback mechanism that means fads eventually have to prove themselves or die out.
I suspect it is the feedback from the stricter compiler, not differences in training data between python and rust
I feel like 20 or 30 years ago, the average person seemed to have more disposable income.
Big if true but is it true?
Totally - the (useful) economic models they are bringing are being extrapolated into very unusual territory!
If AIs become smart enough to outperform a critical mass of humans across the board, that's the singularity and whilst the economic model says all humans out of jobs means no consumers, the model isn't really valid anymore because the underlying assumptions are just broken too, so you can't take the model too seriously. Obviously it would be very disruptive but the demand destruction economic model just isn't making useful predictions anymore.
It's satirical argument against claims that computers will never be as intelligent as humans.
I enjoy having a DVD player for the kids, it makes curating their options so much easier.
Thankyou, this is the comment I came here for - advice on alternatives!
Yes, it is much easier to train someone to use AI than to train them to have sufficiently baked-in math and language skills to be able to leverage the AI.
Integration of the air cooling and water heating. For example, I have a air conditioner pumping heat out of my house right next to a box that's putting heat into the water coming into my house.
We are a happy paying customer at $DAYJOB.
Also, I looked into omfiles for a project recently, I was very impressed with their speed and blown away by the compression ratios!
Yes this is much stronger and relevant evidence
When I watched a very short clip juxtaposed next to a clip of a nazi salute, then it looked like one to me.
But when I watched it in context, it looked like a man putting a hand on his heart and then proffering his thanks to the audience.
My belief is that it was most likely not a nazi salute and is not relevant evidence in the important task of assessing Musk's political stances.
It's fun to sit down and draw what the board looks like when you cut and flatten the torus before you watch the video!
Bonus points if you hit upon the other 2D projection that is useful (I didn't)
The way you learn is totally different from the way a novice learns; they don't have a vast memorised store of knowledge, let alone the connected structure over that memorised knowledge. When you learn something, it gets incoporated thanks to these foundations.
But the foundations start with memorisation.
Projects are less efficient for learning foundational skills. They have their place, but with infinite funds I would still give my children an education with a bedrock of boring drill and testing and memorisation.
I just went and had a flutter at being a high school math teacher. I went in saying 'I never used math to create until my honours year, I want different for my students'.
I soon changed my mind; I think those of us who become expert have often have really rich memories of a project where we learnt so much, but we just don't remember episodically all the accumulated learning that happened in boring classrooms to enable the project-induced higher order synthesis.
Nothing, they just don't make the headlines.
Okay, but you can do the same in dynamically typed Python
But the rust code is still safer, e.g. you haven't checked for an `AttributeError` in case `req.cookies`, the point is Rust protects you from this rabbit-hole, if you're prepared to pay the price of wrestling the compiler.
Don't talk about it, be about it.
"deep sleep" here has a technical definition which wasn't what I assumed, and the top 10th percentile is 68 minutes of "deep sleep", so this is probably fine and not a problem.
I'm feeling a bit cheated it's 2025 and I just bought a brand new car that does not drive itself and runs on dead dinosaurs.
Depends if it's a currency or a store of wealth.
E.g. destroy half the gold in the world, price doubles...
The solution to pollution is dilution.
Dilution in time counts as well.
`What do you think is the root cause for this kind of thinking?`
It's probably quite advantageous to have some individuals irrationally hedging against catastrophe--even though they are likely to be wrong, when one of them is very occasionally right the humans survive.
Given that we can't yet predict our reality from the fundamental up, it seems like a failure of imagination to assert that you couldn't get some high-level-similar-to-our-cognition sentient beings under a separate set of coincidences.
I'm willing to run with the 3% figure... But I take issue with the linearity assumption that torturing 34 shrimp is thus worse than torturing a human!