Selling cheaper cannibalizes next season's fashion.
HN user
hawk_
Sorry to Godwin the thread but the Third Reich would like a word.
There's something about keyboard shortcuts - they work. But somehow right-click and copy requires add-ons.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39475342/ - mouse colitis model
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41137210/ - inflammation pathways
Look up CDED (Crohn's disease exclusion diet) which is the first line of treatment for pediatric Crohn's and now it's increasingly being used for adults. So don't dismiss the diet link despite the facts and research.
An important missed angle is the effect of artificial sweeteners on gut microbiome. They cause intestinal inflammation which is relevant for IBD sufferers. My take is that I don't miss out on much by being conservative with food, as we still don't understand these complex interactions well enough. What's the harm in sticking to a balanced whole diet of ingredients that were available to our ancestors 200years or more ago.
halve my effective memory in order to completely eliminate the tail latency problem,
Wouldn't you have a tail latency problem on the write side though if you just blindly apply it every where? As in unless all the replicas are done writing you can't proceed.
I like the formulatiom that 100% of the cancer tumors have DHMO and no one has done anything about it.
If there's a fundamental culture shift,
You mean this culture shift is needed for the masses but I don't think that's the case. In my widest social circle I am not aware of anyone giving alcohol to young kids (yes by the time they are 16ish yes but even that's rare). Most guardians would willingly do similar with locked devices.
The real problem is that the governments/companies won't get to spy on you if locked devices are given to children only. They want to spy on us all. That's the missing cultural shift.
What is their Claude code equivalent?
You just copy paste as in you copy paste all the necessary context and the results. You don't give it access to your codebase for read or write, correct?
"I am seeing" as in do you use CO2 batteries at home or something?
If you tested this on macos, be careful. The fsync on it lies.
Durability always has an asterisk i.e. guaranteed up to N number of devices failing. Once that N is set, your durability is out the moment those N devices all fail together. Whether that N counts local disks or remote servers.
How much impact do the various compression formats have on query performance?
Yes but try putting that on your CV.
Ok a related note, how does it compare to SeaStar?
That's totally something a bot would say to blend in ;-)
May be the ones that are dead are from poor imitation of more successful bots that are operating in our midst whose comments aren't dead?
For those discussions with the LLM do you just use Gemini chat or chat GPT etc... i.e. the chat interface?
For sure no two groups want the same subset but is there no "standard way" to opt in / out in the ecosystem? It's strange that there are large orgs like Google enforcing style guidelines but manual code reviews are required to enforce it. (or may be my understanding of that's enforced is wrong)
Is there a way to pass compiler switches to disable specific C++ features? Or other static analysis tools that break the build upon using prohibited features?
I can't imagine those examples you picked implemented in Erlang performing anywhere close to the Zig/C++ ones. So the "ad-hoc subset" there is by design.
Is Lyme disease much of a problem in Europe though?
Deceleration requirements are going to be harder than acceleration, one would think so how would you apply full brakes with the same motor?
When should one use D2 vs graphviz?
if a Contributor Distributes
Doesn't this only apply to contributors and dev users?
Yep the JVM structured concurrency implementation is amazing. One thing I got wondering especially when reading this post on HN though is if stackless coroutines could (have) fit the JVM in some way to get even better performance for those who may care.
If this was done the classical C way, you would always have to stack-save a number of registers
I see, so you're saying that GCC can be coaxed into gathering only the relevant registers to stack and unstack not blindly do all of them?
This is amazing to me that you can do this in Zig code directly as opposed to messing with the compiler.