gs17

But that’s true even if the creator was still alive.

The foundation even tried to double dip on this by claiming Otto Frank as a co-author right before copyright expiration, three decades after his passing.

The model card has comparisons with both 3.1 Pro and other models:

https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Ge...

I really do not want to have to drop everything and verify that 10 behaves close enough to 9.9 for my specific task

Or worse, you run the evals and 10 is a huge regression from 9.9, and you get stuck with either a project to figure out if you can fix it or knowing the product will drop in quality in a way that's entirely outside your control.

If you ask "why should I drink this poison?" or "why should I fire my gun randomly into this crowd?" should it refuse to push back? A leading question in no way implies it should follow your lead.

I'm pretty sure the different animals/plants are just themed suits of cards and which one has which number doesn't matter.

Open models have a lot of providers. You can even just use OpenRouter if you want.

That's what I lean towards with the exception that Gemma is also good on a lot of tasks and cheap, while not being Chinese.

It's still possible to get a dump from the Settings page, just with a checkbox that says "if you use this for AI training we might ban you".

aquire comment points to be able to answer

I thought it was the opposite, you need answer points in order to comment (which resulted in people using answers as comments because they had no other option).

There's some 98XXX codes that make the list too.

It varies so much by brand, too. Some brands are too aggressive and end up ping-ponging you in the lane if you let them, and then there's my new Mazda where it doesn't seem to work in any case where I want it to work, but will fight me as hard as it can if I try to take a highway exit.

That sounds like the kind of feature where there's a setting buried in the menus for it.

I don't know about 50 to 150, but someone near me appears to have put up their own speed limit sign and the font is slightly off, so my car sees it as 75 instead of 25 (and fortunately doesn't set itself to it, but helpfully gives me a single-button way to set my cruise control to match).

If you need "incognito" tabs that last longer, it might be worth looking into something like the Temporary Containers addon for Firefox.

or as if there was a third person in the chatroom whose messages I can't see.

If you set off a classifier, that's how it looks to Claude.

HackerRank Screen compresses the top of the hiring funnel by replacing manual resume reviews and unstructured phone screens with structured, auto-scored assessments

That seems to be a different type of product.

Not as smart as modern frontier models, but Moondream and Molmo can do that sort of thing.

I'm a little confused, is this an ATS system that anyone actually uses? If not, I'm not sure how it's better than just asking ChatGPT to score your resume out of 100. Why would you want to optimize your resume for a system no one is using to score it?

I was surprised to see the "Big Beautiful Bill" tax incentive for financing a new US-made car had a gradual phase out above $100,000, although it's implemented as a step function instead of a linear one.

I really hope it can get LuaTeX support at some point, and SVG output added back in (although it hasn't been updated in two years, so it might be up to me). I have a project where this would solve a big problem if it had both of those. TikZJax might solve it better but it also doesn't support LuaTeX either and it feels like a bigger ask.

In the US, you don't really get an option to choose. At most you'll get "paying union dues to the one that controls the contract, or not paying", often you don't get that much.

I think now it's "Hey, ChatGPT, is this a good idea?".

The same China that started construction on at least 10 reactors last year?

People who have no time to camp, no botting tools or skills, etc can exchange their money instead.

But they only need to do that because of the scalpers! The scalpers aren't adding value, they're adding friction and expecting people to pay extra for it!

I want to agree, but it's hard to figure out what's fair, and I doubt Valve has enough verified data to make it fair right now even if we had a good rule for it. Each way I can think of (account age, gameplay time, games owned, past event participation) has a big issue. Same issue for the Steam Frame, I'd personally love if they weighed my VR time to bump me up the queue, but at the same time it feels like a "the rich get richer" kind of unfairness.

Until earlier this year, Tools for Humanity offered new participants the option to claim tokens of Worldcoin.

I'm surprised they gave up on that entirely. It seemed like the only reason anyone would willingly get involved with this, even if their coin has lost almost all of its value and it seems to be part of their legal issues.

I think it wasn't so much that ties aren't possible, but that ties don't mean "no one wins". If you make one district safe and three districts are a coin toss between your two rivals, one of them has much more power than you in the end.

I live near plenty of them, they still require to you merge with traffic after. You do "queue and wait for your turn", but immediately after you have to find a gap to insert yourself into before you run out of road.

Plenty of the ones near me are just a concrete blob, unless a little pole with reflectors counts as an art piece.

What makes it seem crazy is cars entering have right of way.

I saw that on either Top Gear or The Grand Tour and was convinced they were just making fun of the French. It's really odd to not have changed it when everyone else learned that lesson already.