gowld

The OP says as much, and links to a Google Search results that says the same.

"Activating Pro" doesn't mean "paying". It means selecting a slower/smarter model.

Look up "APL" and "J".

Flag AI slop.

"The eight questions" but they aren't questions

I've rarely felt labels helpful, and a label can't fit all the information needed for general study of paintings.

What's happening in Iran, if not world government?

so if I tell a model ...

Even better:

"so if I tell a *human"..."

then whose achievement is the result?

The word "just" is the mark of a coward.

AI is only as good as a human mathemetician, which we don't have enough of? "just"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_conjecture

The conjecture was first stated for two variables by Ludwig Kraus in 1884 [...] an example of a difficult question in algebraic geometry that can be understood using little beyond a knowledge of calculus.

The Jacobian conjecture is number 16 in Stephen Smale's 1998 list of Mathematical Problems for the Next Century. It was notorious for the large number of published and unpublished false proofs that turned out to contain subtle errors.

Trying and failing to prove something tells you quite a lot about what a counterexample would look like.

In the US, real estate purchases come with "title insurance", because there is no official, guaranteed, land registry database.

It's not really a vuln when using context is exactly what the AI system is designed to do.

I read the article.

Book Prizes Do Work How I Think.

It's just like, someone's opinion, man.

On average, Americans donate 1-2% of income, while spending 7-20% less on contributions to government.

On the other hand, Americans receive less for the government, and spend more on caring for themselves (health care) than Europeans receive from the government.

To sort that you, you'd have to figure out how cost-efficient the two models are, for services provided.

Medical services are for-profit, not the hospitals. The hospitals funnel money to for-profit vendors.

There is an ocean in the middle of the "western hemisphere". Did you mean "Americas continent countries"?

Consent matters.

The black hat can find 0-day escalation in your sandbox, too.

A user account is a sandbox.

Users do not want the agent to be restricted. They want the agent to read the user's mind and resolving the user's cognitive dissonance and contradictory preferences.

This is how the criminal courts operate (juries).

That is "correct" grammar, English as she is spoke.

Put your home address in the comments. Problem solved.

Written communication serves separable purposes:

* Replicating speech, Archiving speech, and separating the acts of speaking and listening from each other. There are alternatives to written format.

* Speech that can be edited easily, until it is perfected.

* Speech that be sped up, slowed down, and jumped around with random access and search.

* Silent speech.

These features can be achieved with alternative technologies.

Written communication also has drawbacks. It is a lossy compression of spoken speech.

The train paths are drawn on a 2D layer above the buildings, not at z-index that matches the proper 3-D position. So the paths appear to weave around and over the tops of buildings.

A PhD is a doctor of philosophy. Science is a natural philosophy.

Philosophy is a broad, vague category.

Search all government auctions in one place, *know what they're worth before you bid*

So the blog post contradicts the entire premise of the site.

This is just an ad for their valuation service.

An option to disable animation and show the paper links in a simple list would be helpful.

It's amazing that business would tolerate paying staff to build products on one person's prototype hobby language.

"wrong" or "random" is not the same as "fiction"

"non-fiction" doesn't mean "correct".

arXiv enables peer review!

arXiv users are the peers doing the review.

"Peer review" has existed for centuries before journals created their own bad for-profit version.

Your comment is not responsive to the comment you replied to, which was a critique of point 19.