gopled

This guy called it back in 2013: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6349808

The whole thread is an interesting read in retrospect, quite a mix of effusiveness and skepticism: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6349349

It seems odd to me how she's being punished so much for defrauding investors, but not for endangering patients with fraudulent blood tests.

Is the latter just easier to prosecute because of the paper trail? Or is the law biased more towards punishing financial crimes?